认证评论 - Chemical Engineering Journal
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

想发大子刊 2023-03-06

First review, RRC has been 10 days, reviewer 2+ unchanged, seeking good news, please, please.

SH 2023-03-05

Finally submitted for review on 2023.03.04, it was very difficult, I hope to at least be given a chance for modification, I beg you!

观书 2023-03-05

March 5, 2023. It has been almost 5 days since the completion of the review comments. We are very grateful for the guidance and efforts of the editors and reviewers. We hope the editor can see and acknowledge our efforts and dedication in the reply letter. We really want our research work to have good results and we eagerly anticipate receiving good news from the editor. Please, we beg you!!!

Akira12345 2023-03-05

Hello everybody,

Could you please provide me with an example of an appeal letter?
My manuscript on battery materials was rejected after undergoing an external review, involving two major revisions and ultimately resulting in rejection. The reason cited for the rejection was a perceived lack of innovation.
I have made the decision to appeal this decision.
Therefore, if you happen to possess an appeal letter, I kindly request that you share it with me.
Thank you very much.

fsdsfsf 2023-03-04

First revision: One reviewer has comments, but no other person has any comments.
Revision requested after the first review: Surprisingly, two more reviewers have been added. What does this mean?

Nanfeng 2023-03-03

2023.2.21 submitted to journal
2023.2.25 with editor
2023.3.1 under review
2023.4.3 Required Reviews Completed
2023.4.9 Major revision
2023.4.30 Revision submitted
2023.5.2 With editor
2023.5.9 under review
2023.5.28 accept

Translation:

2023.2.21 - Submitted to journal
2023.2.25 - Under the editor's consideration
2023.3.1 - Under review
2023.4.3 - Required reviews completed
2023.4.9 - Major revision needed
2023.4.30 - Revision submitted
2023.5.2 - Under the editor's consideration
2023.5.9 - Under review
2023.5.28 - Accepted

Seeb99 2023-03-03

The review process is a bit slow. It has been two months since it was submitted for review in early January. Is this normal?

小男孩0911 2023-03-03

2022 12.30 submitted to journal
2023 01.02 with editor
2023 01.04 under review
2023 01.31 required review completed
2023 01.31 major revised (two minor revisions, one major revision)
2023 02.12 submitted revision to journal
2023 02.16 under review
2023 03.02 required review completed
2023 03.02 accept
Overall, the speed is relatively fast. Thank you to the editor and three reviewers. This is my first paper with 10+ pages.

jin2468 2023-03-03

2023.2.21 Submission
2023.2.26 with editor
It has not changed and is still in the hands of the editor.
Why is it so slow?

SonderZZ 2023-03-03

Reply on the 18th, now I have been continuously with the editor, what's the situation.

Surkey 2023-03-02

15 Feb 2023 submitted to journal
20 Feb 2023 with editor
2 March 2023 not updated

嘴巴选手小天 2023-03-02

02 Mar 2023 Under Review

光路 2023-03-02

On March 2, 2023, a review opinion was received, but currently, it is not possible to see what content is written inside. It is estimated that we will have to wait for another review opinion to come back.

lchs 2023-03-02

Thank you
2022-11-17, submitted to journal;
2022-11-18, with editor;
2022-11-21, under review;
2023-12-13, required reviews completed;
2023-12-18, major revision (30 days, coincided with everyone in the group taking a vacation, requested a 10-day extension);
2023-1-16, revision submitted;
2023-1-18, under review;
2023-1-28, required reviews completed;
2023-2-14, major revision;
2023-2-19, revision submitted;
2023-2-26, accept.

lchs 2023-03-02

Wrong place. You can write a reminder letter for a long time with the editor, just don't think about offending the editor.

lchs 2023-03-02

Write a reminder letter, my dear brother.

DX 2023-03-02

Has CEJ closed down? It hasn't even been a week since it landed in the editor's hands.

我在人间数日子 2023-03-02

I arrived at the editor's place on the 19th. Today is March 2nd.

小男孩0911 2023-03-02

I also come to request one.

ajkdajkld 2023-03-02

I also have some good luck, please give me a chance to make changes, I beg you.

马弗炉炸鸡 2023-03-01

I also want to have some good luck, please!

懂得! 2023-03-01

Let me win one too, please, I beg you!

观书 2023-03-01

March 1, 2023. The revision comments have been completed. Thank you very much for the guidance and effort from the editors and reviewers. We hope that the revised results can be recognized and approved by the editors and reviewers. We really want to share our research achievements with our peers. Please, please!

周末不想加班 2023-03-01

Posted on January 30, reviewed on February 2, required reviews completed on February 25. Updated on February 27, still marked as Required Reviews Completed. It feels like it might be rejected.

周末不想加班 2023-03-01

Reviewer 2 +, probably 3. The second reviewer finished in the morning and made some updates. In the afternoon, the progress went directly to 2 + and entered Required Reviews Completed, feeling like it's 3.

Scout. 2023-02-28

Hello, may I ask how to find out how many reviewers have finished reviewing?

Melody-1994 2023-02-28

It's true, throwing it on the 13th, not moving at all.

嘻嘻嘻xi 2023-02-28

Same. Submitted on February 9th and still with editor.

迷鹿南北 2023-02-28

3.28 remains unchanged, definitely 28 days! Some people have already finished reviewing, while mine is still in the hands of the editor. I don't know what's going on, can any similar brothers shed some light on this?

nancy_wang 2023-02-27

Hello, I would like to ask about the reference checking results after submission. It shows "File not processed - Microsoft Word cannot open the file." This might be because I submitted a PDF file. Will this affect the submitting process? Should I resubmit it?

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started