电气小子 2023-08-07

Where can I find the review process chart for this journal? I couldn't find it. I want to see the different statuses and the required time.

relaying2014 2023-08-03

The review process is so fast, how many reviewers are there?

way01 2023-08-02

Under renovation, hoping that everything will go smoothly next, amen~~

relaying2014 2023-08-01

The speed of this review is lightning fast! It took less than ten days to complete the review after submission.

way01 2023-08-01

2023.7.24 Major revision
The review speed is good, hoping everything goes smoothly~

爸爸 2023-07-28

Labor Day is over, it has been almost three months. I hope for a good outcome.

way01 2023-07-13

2023.7.13 Under Review.

way01 2023-07-12

2023.7.12 editor assigned. Time changes, why is it so slow?

way01 2023-07-04

2023.7.3 Editor Assigned Time Change

way01 2023-07-01

Hope to submit for review soon~

追风少年啊 2023-06-09

In addition, all manuscripts undergo double-blind peer review.

追风少年啊 2023-06-09

The review is very serious and meticulous, with a high overall quality requirement. It has been revised four or five times, but the overall speed is considered normal.

The Frontier 2023-02-10

Ask if you don't understand. This year, the Chinese Academy of Sciences' classification has changed to "first-tier top." What's the story behind this?

自动化 2022-11-11

Top in the first district, with high requirements.

噶叟尔 2022-10-08

Let me put it this way, within the impact factor of 10.5 for this journal, I have contributed around 0.1.

哈哈哈哈哈 2022-07-21

The feeling is good, quite formal, at least 5 reviewers, and the self-citation is not high either. Is 4.8% considered high? Now there is encouragement for domestic journals, and I believe they will get better and better in the future.

爱你喔 2022-07-20

People are not familiar with this journal, so here is a brief review for everyone, only for reference when submitting articles in the future (strongly discouraged). First, let's talk about why the impact factor of this journal is so high this year. You can look at the self-citation situation of this journal. After acceptance, the editors will ask you to heavily cite papers from this journal, just like what Applied Energy does. Therefore, the impact factor is very high this year, but the quality of papers is only at the level of EI and the fourth quartile. Now, let's talk about the editors of this journal. Some domestic journals are very irregular. The chief editor and associate editor listed on the official website are just for show and have no real power. The decision-making authority for papers is in the hands of editors who do not understand academia. If they are in a good mood, they will accept your paper; if not, they will reject it easily. In reality, this journal is actually managed by a few editors who do not understand anything, but are in charge of the journal. They can even reject articles that are approved by reviewers. I have personally experienced this, and it is very true.

剑豪剑豪 2022-06-29

Why did this journal only have an impact factor in 2016, and why is it so high?