大颗好果 2023-02-15

11.5 submission
11.20 feedback, with 20 days for major revisions
December 1st feedback
December 7th acceptance
The overall timeframe is very fast, the reviewers are highly professional, and they provided many suggestions that helped improve the quality of the article. The editor is very good, making this the most enjoyable experience I have had with submissions. The journal emphasizes a deep understanding of the material's mechanism, rather than its practical application, and does not require a lot of data. However, they do expect strong innovation.

就是想毕业 2023-01-19

Is there anyone whose submission is "under review" from the beginning? After a week of submission, the status shows "submitted to the editorial office," which means an editor has been assigned. There is a link to send an email to the editor below, but it is still "under review."

就是来看看 2022-11-08

What happened to you in the end, OP? Did you send it for repair?

escape SCI 2022-07-30

It has been 10 days in the editor's hands, may I ask if the status will change to "in peer review" or will it remain unchanged?

一平方米 2021-10-21

Hello, may I ask if there is a clear status for the review? It has been in the editor's hands for a week, but there has been no progress.

Huiming Yin 2021-03-06

First time submitting to this journal, the review process and subsequent handling were both very fast, with high efficiency. I really like this journal.
2.1 Submission, assigned editor on the same day.
2.16 Review comments returned, four reviewers, all minor revisions.
2.23 Revised.
2.24 "Acceptance pending," editor raised some formatting issues. Returned on the same day.
2.25 Accepted.
3.5 Proofreading.
3.6 Online.

Peiming Liu 2021-01-10

After submitting, three editors provided valuable feedback on the content of the manuscript, while also expressing a high level of recognition for it. After minor revisions, the manuscript was accepted and published online the next day, showing a very high efficiency.