认证评论 - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
默默努力 2023-02-10
Jun 04, 2022 submitted
Employed after a major revision, the review process was quite fast. However, after submission, only one reviewer accepted the review, and the delay in receiving reviews from other reviewers affected the progress of the review. After sending a reminder email to the editor, the editor resubmitted to another reviewer. One month later, the reviewer's comments came back, and the paper was accepted after revisions.
Dec 08, 2022 Accept
Although it took half a year, time was wasted on the reviewers. Overall, the editor's efficiency was still acceptable.
听曲散步 2023-02-06
The article has been accepted. Let me share the whole process. It was transferred from CEJ.
Currently, it seems that this journal is very, very slow during the editing and reviewing process. However, once the comments came back, the subsequent process was quite fast.
November 27, 22: Submitted to the journal
November 29, 22: With editor
December 5, 22: With editor
December 17, 22: Sent a reminder email to the editor, but they didn't respond...
December 28, 22: Under review
January 15, 23: Required reviews completed
January 25, 23: Minor revision
February 3, 23: Revision has been submitted
February 5, 23: Accepted
铁拳男人 2023-02-04
Guys, can't we enter Asheville today? Is it under maintenance?
水环境菜鸡 2023-02-02
I have previously submitted an article, and the comments from ten reviewers directly made me a headache. This time, let's see how many reviewers there are.
I submitted the article on February 2nd, and the manuscript number has already reached over 1200. Calculating, there are nearly 12,000 submissions in a year. Considering the current annual publication volume (2000+), the acceptance rate is less than 20%.
铁拳男人 2023-02-02
2.1 Manuscript review completed.
2.2 Accepted.
I have to say, from submission to acceptance, it took only one month and 9 days, which is really fast. Wishing the journal continued success.
changboshi 2023-02-02
01.09 sub
01.12 UR
01.23 UR
01.31 UR
The status has changed 3 times,,, I wonder how the current situation is.
铁拳男人 2023-02-01
Editor Yang Xin is extremely efficient.
铁拳男人 2023-02-01
1.28 Returned for repair
1.30 with editor
2.1 under review
即墨君焰 2023-01-28
Submitted to journal on January 23rd, looking forward to graduation soon.
听曲散步 2023-01-25
Finally, the feedback is back. I am a little happy. Time to make some updates.
January 25th, 23 - Minor Revision
As expected, there are three reviewers. The editor gave us a month to make revisions.
The editor is Dong-Yeun Koh.
good1 2023-01-25
I received the reviews on the second day of submission, and there was 1 review completed.
铁拳男人 2023-01-24
No, one major revision and one minor revision, do you have any? I am very efficient in reviewing. Two reviewers, one takes two days and the other takes three days to complete the review.
good1 2023-01-23
May I ask if there were any rejections from the two reviewers, namely the one on 1.10?
铁拳男人 2023-01-23
2023.1.23 Major Revision
听曲散步 2023-01-18
January 15th, 23 Completed Required Reviews,
What's going on? It's almost the 19th already, why hasn't the editor made a decision yet?
So slow, everything is dragging on and on.
铁拳男人 2023-01-11
2023.1.11 reviews completed: 2.
铁拳男人 2023-01-10
2023.1.10 reviews completed: 1 (Is this situation a rejection? I seriously suspect that it collided with the same reviewer who rejected my previous application to Applied Surface Science. I recommend that the reviewer forgot to make changes; otherwise, how could it be completed so quickly?)
铁拳男人 2023-01-10
2023.1.10 Reviews completed: 1 (Has this situation been rejected? I strongly suspect that it collided with the reviewer who previously rejected the application for surface science. I recommend that the reviewer forgot to make changes, otherwise how could it be done so quickly?)
铁拳男人 2023-01-07
2022.12.23 submitted to journal -> Submitted to the journal on December 23, 2022.
2022.12.25 with editor -> Under review by the editor on December 25, 2022.
2023.1.6 under review -> Currently under review as of January 6, 2023.
2023.1.7 Review invitations accepted -> Accepted review invitations on January 7, 2023.
mrvita 2023-01-05
Only one reviewer's opinion was returned, probably because the editor was also impatient, so they made some minor revisions, changed a few wordings, and sent it back to the editor, waiting for about ten days. Finally, it was accepted, but this editor is just relatively slow...
小汤圆 2023-01-03
It has been a month with Editor, this is too slow.
咚咚呛 2022-12-31
No rush, I checked yesterday and it was submitted for review on the 28th. Hopefully, there will be good news. Just waiting to graduate.
good1 2022-12-30
Excuse me, have you reminded about the manuscript?
咚咚呛 2022-12-30
Hello, I am also an editor. How is your article now? Have you received it?
咚咚呛 2022-12-30
I have been "under review" with the editor for about a month now. And now, it has been another month since the major revision was returned to the editor. Sigh.
good1 2022-12-30
Hello, I have also submitted to this journal. The editor has been silent for 20 days already, and I also want to send a reminder. Can I refer to your reminder letter? This is my QQ number: 1908432982.
听曲散步 2022-12-28
December 28th Under Review
Wow, this is so sudden. It was still "with editor" on the 27th. Don't these old folks take Christmas vacation? Could it be that my submission reminder email had an effect?
Sigh, I don't know how long the review process will take. I'm really feeling extremely anxious now. I just want to graduate, ugh.
小毛驴Y 2022-12-27
Christmas is on holiday, probably.
小汤圆 2022-12-27
+1, there has been no activity for half a month.
科研小白 2022-12-26
It has been 16 days since the major repairs and I am still with the editor. This is really slow. I beg and hope that you can accept.
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started