认证评论 - APL Photonics
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

Hwang996 2023-07-03

I am too... It has been 20 days.

Polaris_optele 2023-06-17

What happened in the end?

HFUT_Hefei 2023-04-05

It has been 7 days since the submission. The editor-in-chief assigned it to the deputy editor, but it took 3 days for the deputy editor to accept it. Then the deputy editor took 4 days to review it, and the efficiency was especially slow.

huhu159 2023-03-21

Could you please tell me if this journal is good? What is the reason for rejection? Is it due to lack of innovation or is there a problem with the theory?

朱蓝 2022-10-24

Hello, may I ask if there is a proof stage after this journal accepts the submission?

头还没秃 2022-10-08

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal has a word template.

PHYS 2022-05-31

After one month of review, it was rejected. The comments from the three reviewers were very fair and helpful, so I plan to revise and resubmit. APL Photonics has a good reputation internationally, and the quality of their papers is generally high. The editorial board maintains strict control over the papers, and fortunately, it has not been negatively influenced by Chinese researchers.

nancy0803 2021-10-11

The content is detailed and true.

NJ120 2021-06-25

May I ask how long it took for your manuscript to be reviewed?

NJ120 2021-06-24

It has been two weeks since I submitted it, but it has not yet reached the editor's hands. Has anyone encountered this situation before?

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started