认证评论 - Journal of Advanced Research
ggyyg 2022-05-13
Yes, it has not been submitted for review yet.
紫云风清cc 2022-05-13
After the technical review, does it mean that it has not been submitted for review yet with the editor?
紫云风清cc 2022-05-13
May I ask how long it takes with the editor?
农夫 2022-05-05
Submitted for acceptance after major and minor revisions, the process took 8 months. It is predicted that the Impact Factor will be greater than 12 this year, so those who are not in a hurry can consider it.
ggyyg 2022-04-20
After the technical review, if there are formatting issues, you will be notified via email to make corrections. If there are no formatting issues, the review process will proceed directly. Generally, it takes about two weeks to process once.
ss 2022-04-20
May I ask if it is after technical review that requires formatting changes or after working with the editor that requires formatting changes? Thank you.
ss 2022-04-20
May I ask if the format is revised after technical review notification or after notification with the editor? Thank you.
L+C 2022-03-03
Thank you, @ggyyg.
ggyyg 2022-02-28
Unused, it seems like the editor only processes it once every two weeks, very slow. It takes me a whole month to submit it for review.
L+C 2022-02-28
Do all co-authors need to create an account to confirm the email reply when submitting?
ggyyg 2022-02-17
After two weeks of technical review, my experience is that an email was sent stating that some formatting needed to be modified before submission for review, focusing on plant gene functionality.
云姐 2022-02-16
Are you also in the field of agriculture?
C& AGW 2022-02-16
5 days, rejected due to too many articles.
云姐 2022-02-13
I just invested for 10 days as well. It has been sent for review, and it relates to agricultural integration.
kittyone 2022-01-24
After three months with no response after contacting the editor via email, I decided to leave a message for the manager editor on the website. The next day, I received an email saying that they would make sure the editor addresses the issue as soon as possible. The next day, the status changed to "Under Review," but I'm not sure if it has been sent for review or if the status simply changed. I plan to inquire again after one month.
kittyone 2022-01-10
Except for biology and agricultural research, I do not recommend submitting to this journal. It is too slow, already over two months and still in the "with editor" status. I suspect they cannot find reviewers. I have sent a letter urging them, but there has been no response. I feel that this journal is not very professional, and it is also a new journal. The future situation is uncertain. If this kind of journal doesn't work, it simply doesn't work.
Gloira-P 2022-01-09
Did you receive it in the end?
Gloira-P 2022-01-04
This is too much of a violation. After the status is under review, they actually said it wasn't submitted for review?! I used to think that Egyptians were more friendly towards China.
门口老大爷 2021-12-30
Have your status with the editor changed? Has it been sent for review? I have also been with the editor for half a month, and it has been several days now. I don't know how the process works.
+和+ 2021-12-16
This journal is still very good, with the impact factor still increasing. It is expected to be at least 13+ next year. The requirements are strict, and the review process is detailed.
After submission, it requires patience to wait. It is normal for the pending technical assessment and with the editor to take about a month. Both times I submitted, it took about 3 weeks. The first time I had no experience, so I had to make formatting changes.
The speed of the review process is okay, usually taking 1-2 months. After the revisions are made and accepted, the online publication is very fast, usually within 2 weeks.
Overall, it takes about 2-3 months. This speed is normal for a regular journal. If you want it faster, I don't recommend submitting.
Additionally, there is a bug where the journal does not provide the volume and page numbers in advance for online papers, which makes referencing inconvenient...
shenlanhu 2021-12-14
Excuse me, did the editor ask for a format change?
正在投稿 2021-12-14
Rejected for a week, not submitted for review.
kittyone 2021-12-13
My submission with the editor has been over a month now. I have sent two emails in between to inquire about the situation, but haven't received any replies. What's going on? Are there any colleagues who have encountered the same problem?
leocupid1916 2021-11-07
July 17th submitted
July 31st notified of format issue
August 2nd resubmitted after modification
September 17th received revision comments, major revisions required, 5 reviewers, all comments were professional
September 28th received revised comments
October 25th completed required reviews
November 3rd, accepted
Overall, if you are not in a hurry for paper acceptance, you can choose this journal. After the top 10, the review requirements are stricter. We also hope that the journal will continue to improve and enter the top tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences soon.
kittyone 2021-11-04
投 - to submit
11月4日 - November 4th
慢是慢了点 - It is a bit slow
但是 - but
程序 - program
还是 - still
在走 - running
不至于 - not to the extent of
没有人管 - no one is managing
Translation: Submitted on October 14th, with editor on November 4th. It is a bit slow, but the program is still running, so there is someone managing it.
kittyone 2021-11-01
The format sent on the 26th is still pending technical assessment. It has been half a month since it was submitted, and it has not been reviewed yet!
kittyone 2021-10-28
Posted on October 16th, notified of format changes on the 22nd, resubmitted on the 24th, returned on the 26th stating there were still some format issues, resubmitted on the 28th with no response yet, but according to the email, it seems like it's ready for review. Overall, it has been a bit unpleasant and slow in the early stages. I hope it will be faster in the later stages and also hope that my article will be accepted.
yuanyuian 2021-10-13
May I ask how long will it take to get the results after the modification?
yuanyuian 2021-10-13
How long will it take to receive the decision after the modification?
zhou- 2021-08-23
The journal emphasizes innovation and completeness, and requires a large amount of data, otherwise it will not be sent for review! The requirements are very strict, with a total of 5 reviewers.
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started