认证评论 - MATERIALS & DESIGN
run7700 2023-07-17
For the past four months, in the beginning, there were only a few days under review. Later, there were more than ten waves of invitations for peer reviewers, but no one accepted. Finally, there was one who accepted and reviewed it quickly. After a week, a second reviewer came, and it took them a week to review it. After about five more days, the feedback came back, and both reviewers rejected it. It's over. It took a long time, and the result is not very good.
KYJX 2023-05-30
Great journal, solidly in the first quartile of Chinese Academy of Sciences, you can tell just by looking at the ranking. With 58 first quartile journals, the ranking is average, but the future is all about being in the first quartile.
Jack-xiang 2023-05-19
You are mentally abnormal and not suitable for scientific research.
小强 2023-05-17
I would like to ask the experienced experts who have published before: is it necessary for this journal to include experiments? If articles are related to theoretical simulations, are they not appreciated?
刻晴老公 2023-05-17
Oh my goodness, such a deep grudge and resentment! Directly massacring the whole group, is that really acceptable?
小强 2023-05-16
May I ask you, experts, if it is necessary to conduct experiments for this journal? I am working on theoretical formulas, simulations, and parameter analysis. I am planning to use someone else's experiments. Will this lead to direct rejection?
KYJX 2023-05-08
How many months did you invest before saying this after being rejected? Your heart is too dark, hahaha.
科研小虫虫 2023-05-04
After checking your message history, tell me, were you rejected by this journal? Hahaha~~~ Stay strong!
生来倔强 2023-04-20
The reviewer was very meticulous and made two revisions immediately. It was the first paper I submitted during my first year of graduate school, and it greatly helped me with my later writing. I am grateful to the journal!
FIXIT 2023-04-18
Now these open-source journals are also very slow.
我是涛哥哥 2023-04-14
Got taller among the shorties, normal!
布袋袋 2023-04-14
2023.3.23 Submission
2023.3.24 Editing
2023.4.13 Rejection
Not reviewed, been editing all this time. It's really absurd, not even reviewed, then why not reject quickly? They forcibly delayed it for 3 weeks before finally sending an email saying that there were too many submissions and suggesting to submit elsewhere.
小强 2023-04-03
Excuse me, seniors, is this journal fast?
一阵强风 2023-02-07
"tinghaode" in English means "understand" or "comprehend".
Alex_aldrin 2023-02-04
The text translates to: "Submitted on the 25th with the editor, on the 30th it remains in its original state."
一阵强风 2023-02-04
I submitted it on January 30th, and it is still in the "Submit" status. How long does it usually take?
sciyu 2023-02-03
Excuse me, big boss, do all the authors need to confirm the confirmation email sent to each of them after submitting the manuscript? Excuse me, big boss, do all the authors need to confirm the confirmation email sent to each of them after submitting the manuscript? Excuse me, big boss, do all the authors need to confirm the confirmation email sent to each of them after submitting the manuscript?
zjrzjrzjr 2023-01-21
It has been ten days since I submitted, may I ask how long it took for your status to change later?
zoomingzym 2022-12-21
2022年 中科院1区 translates to "2022 Chinese Academy of Sciences Zone 1" in English.
Conqueror 2022-12-18
Excuse me, boss, do all authors need to confirm the confirmation email sent to each of them after submitting the manuscript?
smcwwww 2022-12-16
The speed was very fast. After submission, it was externally reviewed in just three days. The manuscript was completed in over 20 days. After 7 days, it was returned for revision and directly accepted two weeks later.
栓扣 2022-12-12
10.7 Submit to journal
10.9 Format revision
10.9 Revision
10.11 With editor
10.12 Under review
11.2 One reviewer completed, one accepted
11.12 Required reviews completed
11.13 Two minor revisions
11.28 Revision
12.9 Reminder (because they are minor revisions, the reviewers are generally positive, it's just that the second review hasn't been conducted, probably forgotten)
12.12 Accepted
Thank you to editor Xu Song, DPhil
Pu 2022-11-27
20221010 submitted to journal
20221013 with editor
20221013 under review (changed 8 times in the middle)
20221112 required reviews completed
20221120 under review (probably due to conflicting reviewer opinions, seeking additional reviewers)
20221127 revise
2022.12.04 revised manuscript submitted
2022.12.04 under review
2022.12.23 Accept
mengnan 2022-11-25
What district is this journal in? It is listed as district 2 on the classification table.
Arikia 2022-11-17
No suitable reviewers were found, and the editorial invitation sent was not accepted by the other party.
sim_ai 2022-11-10
Why has the status been "under review" so many times despite the changing time?
发完文章好毕业 2022-11-10
I would like to ask you a question about the issues after acceptance by the journal "Materials & Design".
不想上班想摸鱼 2022-10-21
Received at noon that day
Arikia 2022-10-20
I am a reviewer for Materials Design journal.
不想上班想摸鱼 2022-10-20
7.15 submitted to the journal
7.16 with editor
Approximately 2 months for review comments
9.28 responded to review comments
10.7 Required Reviews Completed
10.20 no changes
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started