认证评论 - AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
㐒罩 2023-08-07
22.4 Submission
22.5 Major revision and resubmission
22.8 Rejection and resubmission
22.11 Minor revision
23.2 Major revision
23.8 Acceptance
The process was challenging, but the outcome was still good!
leo andesen 2023-08-03
2023/4/8 Submit
2023/4/17 With Editor
2023/5/3 Under Review
2023/8/2 Reviews completed
Translated:
2023/4/8 - Submitted
2023/4/17 - With Editor
2023/5/3 - Under Review
2023/8/2 - Reviews completed
karna 2023-07-12
When did you submit the contribution?
在路上djx 2023-07-12
It seems like the time has changed once in the middle, what's going on?
karna 2023-07-12
What happened when the date changed once during the period with the editor? Did the editor change?
ant_crazy_seu 2023-06-14
How can I check how many reviewers have accepted the review? How can I tell if someone has accepted it? I can only see "under review."
tongtong111 2023-06-13
The translation of the text "我最近投的也是" into English is "What I recently invested in is also."
jeffvigi 2023-06-06
2023/3/22 submit
2023/3/27 under review
Still under review until now, sent for review 3 times, no one accepted the review.
This time it's a bit slow, previously it usually got fixed by this time.
启航 2023-06-02
It's been 10 days already, but still no news. Is it the same as before?
kai1120 2023-06-01
It has been over a week and there is no news regarding the submission to the journal.
启航 2023-05-30
It has been a week, and it is indeed a bit slow.
crisis 2023-05-30
May I ask how long "submitted to journal" has been? Mine has been a week, is it still "submitted to journal"?
ZZCCCZ 2023-04-24
Apr 23, 2023 Decision in Process
ZZCCCZ 2023-04-24
March 3 with editor
March 6 Under review
March 9 Under review
March 30 completed 1
Apr 23 Decision in Process
Overall, the journal has been quite fast in terms of speed up to this point.
chster_bobo 2023-04-13
Another thing is that Xiaoxiu directly DIP after returning, and DIP lasts for 16 days. It is said that the final DIP of this journal is between half a month and one month. So, when encountering a DIP that exceeds one week, it is still recommended not to rush for submission and patiently wait.
chster_bobo 2023-04-13
A relatively smooth submission, the second small paper of the doctoral thesis, just sharing:
Submitted on November 18, 2022
With editor on November 20, 2022
Under review on December 1, 2022
Major revisions on January 28, 2023
Minor revisions on March 14, 2023
Accepted on April 12, 2023
ddssew 2023-04-08
This journal is not easy. After submission, the well-established journal has strict review process:
1) Half a month for initial review by the editor-in-chief and deputy editor;
2) Under review: 1 and a half months;
3) Major revision;
4) Under review: 1 month;
5) Major revision;
6) Under review: 1 month;
7) Minor revision;
8) Still under review...
小马的大头 2023-04-01
Great journal, I have had two consecutive articles published in it! The submission to acceptance process took around 6 months.
leo andesen 2023-03-29
May I ask how long it took for you from submission to rejection?
Bazen 2023-03-28
Two reviewers approved, but one reviewer consistently believed that there was insufficient theoretical innovation. After three major revisions, the paper was ultimately rejected. The final decision took three weeks for the editor to make after receiving the reviewers' feedback.
sgxgq 2023-03-28
May I ask how long it usually takes for the submission to the journal to be processed?
LDBS 2022-12-22
It took a whole month for the editor to start sending it for external review.
LDBS 2022-11-23
First submission, recording update progress!
kiehl_cat 2022-10-31
Second submission, the DIP process of the previous journal was relatively slow, but recently it seems to have improved in speed. Thumbs up to the editor.
Submitted in early July, accepted in early October. Went through one major revision in between.
aorsol 2022-10-20
How many reviewers are there?
vvgod 2022-10-18
You can try to submit first, this journal values algorithms a lot.
Shaun 2022-10-18
Hello, may I ask a question? I have developed an algorithm to estimate material properties. The algorithm itself does not have any innovative features, but we are the first ones to work on this specific problem. Is there a high probability of acceptance for such a submission? Or does this journal primarily focus on algorithms rather than the research problem itself? Thank you for sharing your experience.
vvgod 2022-10-14
First trial takes six months, second trial takes ten days, and third trial takes five days. The chief editor and deputy chief editor are both very fast, although the first trial took quite a long time, the overall speed is still good.
mylovelyboy 2022-09-14
A very tortuous submission, especially worth noting.
My first doctoral paper was submitted in April 2021, and the first round of review came back quickly with major revisions given within a month.
The second round was also relatively quick, with major revisions given within a little over a month.
Due to a change in the reviewing expert during the third round, it took nearly half a year. The fourth round of editing provided many suggestions, still requiring major revisions.
The fifth round was finally accepted. It was ultimately accepted in June 2022 and published in the same month.
TonyAmber 2022-09-06
A mathematical algorithm was designed for a specific type of problem in architecture, and it took a little over a month to produce results, which was faster than I expected.
There were two reviewers.
Reviewer 1 provided detailed responses to the nine questions posed by the journal in the format requested by the AIC. Although their focus was slightly different from my paper, they provided meaningful suggestions.
Reviewer 2's comments seemed more inclined towards rejecting the paper rather than completing the review task.
Timeline:
* Jul 25, 2022: Submitted
* Jul 26, 2022: With Editor
* Jul 29, 2022: Under Review
* Aug 11, 2022: Under Review
* Sept 3, 2022: Decision in Process
* Sept 5, 2022: Reject
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started