zzzc 2021-07-24

Received online about a month ago. Now the online process is very fast, and my article went directly to OA (open access). I didn't pay any fees for OA, but I did pay the page charges.

zzzc 2021-07-24

The journal is very fast, and there will be a language editor to help you with language editing, which is great. It's already past 2 o'clock now, and I feel that it will take about three years to be included in the second tier.

雨龙殇 2021-04-06

Using machine learning for the recognition of forest leaves. The first submission to a SCI journal took more than three months, but overall it went smoothly and I am satisfied with it.
December 24, 2020: Submitted.
January 6, 2021: Received first-round review comments quickly. Two reviewers, major revision and minor revision.
February 4, 2021: Responded to first-round review comments.
March 18, 2021: Received second-round review comments. One reviewer raised four questions, patiently made revisions and provided responses.
April 4, 2021: Responded to second-round review comments.
April 5, 2021: Accepted.
Submitted in a rush before New Year's, so there were several errors that were not checked and corrected. Fortunately, the reviewer for major revision was quite interested and raised a lot of questions, which helped enrich the content. The reviewer for minor revision pointed out several grammar and language issues. I didn't hire professional proofreading (too expensive), so I repeatedly considered and modified the language myself.
Only the first reviewer provided some second-round review comments. This time they mentioned that the content was too long and the language needed to be refined. -_-|| I continued to ponder the language throughout the article and reduced several hundred words.
Accepted the day after submission.

沙漠希望 2021-03-24

Follow-up:
Received on March 24, 2021.

沙漠希望 2021-03-24

Submitted on January 29, 2021
Sent for review on February 4, 2021
Revised on March 5, 2021
First revision submitted on March 10, 2021
Minor revision on March 22, 2021 (The email said, "I am pleased to inform you that your paper can be accepted pending minor changes.")
Second revision submitted on March 23, 2021 (Unknown outcome)
Objective evaluation: The journal is getting better and better. The review process is very fast. It is predicted to become a second-tier journal in two years, which is not a big issue.
This is my first SCI paper, relatively simple and rough, but the reviewer's comments were very fair and kind. It is worth investing in, everyone.
I hope to share my experience and be accepted. Good luck!

Essay 2021-01-15

It seems like no reply is needed.

Essay 2021-01-14

Submission on December 11, 2020.
Revision on January 7, 2021.
Submission of revised version on January 12, 2021.
Please send me an email with these specifications tonight.
This revision shows improvements. But there are small problems throughout the manuscript. Please edit the entire manuscript according to the author's instructions from the journal. This will help avoid negative feedback from the proof's development.
I want to ask what this means. The author's instructions found on the official website do not have any formatting requirements at all. This email also does not provide detailed requirements. What should I do next? Can you please explain it to me at 1193372513@qq.com? I would greatly appreciate it.

HWenc 2021-01-12

If convenient, please send an email to hewenc@163.com. Thank you very much!

HWenc 2021-01-12

On the second day after submission, the Current Status shows "Removed by Editor"; however, both the Date Final Disposition Set and Final Disposition are blank, and no reply has been received in the email. Seeking interpretation from experts, what does this mean?