认证评论 - IEEE Access
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

我爱学习haha 2023-05-30

Will the ID numbers be reassigned after everyone makes changes and resubmits? Will another email for external review be sent again? Will the editors be reassigned? Can someone please explain in detail? Help the children!!!

AKON123 2023-05-30

Hello, have the results come out now?

top不是梦 2023-05-29

Does the modification after the editor's acceptance refer to submitting the final version?

jinjin826 2023-05-29

OP, may I ask who admi is?

hello-kitty 2023-05-29

March 5th, first submission.
March 11th, email notification for review.
April 12th, rejection (modification required before resubmission), two reviewers, both rejected.
April 23rd, second submission.
April 26th, email notification for review.
May 29th, acceptance (additional two reviewers, making a total of four reviewers, the new two reviewers rejected, the initial two reviewers suggested acceptance, editor gave acceptance, modification required).
Access journals are much stricter now than before, so it is advised to revise thoroughly before submitting, in order to avoid wasting time.

好难过xcx 2023-05-27

I resubmitted it and it was reviewed the next day. I was amazed at how fast it was.

jinjin826 2023-05-26

How long did it take you to review, OP?

cookie777 2023-05-26

May I ask how long does it take for the resubmission to be reviewed? I feel like the review process for resubmissions is slower.

cookie777 2023-05-26

Excuse me, how long does it take for resubmission to be reviewed? It feels like the review process for resubmission has been slower recently.

清风57 2023-05-24

It's normal. We went through seven reviewers in total, and they were very strict.

jinjin826 2023-05-24

5.23 Third reminder. First, chat with the IEEE support center online, then remind the administrator to submit the manuscript. Received a response that one reviewer's comments have been returned, and another reviewer is still in the process of reviewing. Estimated to receive the review comments within a week.

jinjin826 2023-05-22

Which expert knows why the review process for this journal has recently become longer? It has been 5 weeks already, even after two reminders, and it is still under review!

QUUUUUUU 2023-05-21

3.27: Submitted
4.24: Returned with suggested modifications, encouraged to resubmit
5.5: Second submission
5.18: Accepted

ljrprocc 2023-05-20

5.8 Early Access
5.9 Proof
5.15 Payment
5.20 Published

jinjin826 2023-05-19

Me too, I don't feel very well either. The review period has unexpectedly been extended.

XIxxxxxx HU 2023-05-19

The two replies are exactly the same.

jinjin826 2023-05-19

May I ask if the content of your two follow-up emails is the same? Are they template replies?

top不是梦 2023-05-19

Did you send the reviewer's comments back after reminding them? How long did it take to be accepted after making the revisions according to the reviewer's comments?

小丫丫 2023-05-19

May I ask if the 3-day retrieval you mentioned is on the official website of the journal? Is it referring to Web of Science (WoS)?

XIAOCHEN HU 2023-05-18

It has been 48 days since submission, and I have reminded twice, but it is still under review.

好难过xcx 2023-05-18

4.19 Revised return
4.21 Sent for external review
5.15 Accept (Received a reminder email on May 4th to submit the revised manuscript once, both reviewers had no major issues except for unclear images which needed to be clarified and the request to add references.)
Overall, the review process was fast, and the reviewers were not as bad as mentioned online. At least for me, the two reviewers for my first submission were quite professional, and for the second submission, it was sent back to the original reviewers.

jinjin826 2023-05-18

2023.4.16 Submission
2023.4.23 Under review
2023.5.08 Reminder for submission, undergoing the peer review process
2023.5.15 Reminder for submission, undergoing the peer review process, the same as the previous reminder
-- Still under review

swz 2023-05-18

Why are you so fast?

swz 2023-05-18

May I ask what's the matter with not being assigned ADM?

top不是梦 2023-05-18

Did everyone receive the publication with such a long interval?

想快点跑路 2023-05-17

2023.3.21 - Submission of the manuscript.
2023.3.22 - Initial review completed, manuscript number and editor assigned.
2023.3.28 - External review process initiated, received email stating "We have started the review process for your article."
2023.5.12 - Emailed the editor to inquire about the status of the manuscript, stating that it has been "Under Review" for 45 days.
2023.5.14 - Accepted. Two reviewers, one recommended direct acceptance stating "The content of the research is very interesting," while the other accepted with minor edits. The reviewer raised some minor issues, but they were very professional and likely an industry expert.
2023.5.15 - Final revised version uploaded.
2023.5.15 - Accepted.
Overall, the experience has been great. A year ago, the paper was rejected three or four times in China. The first attempt to expedite the process failed, the second attempt waited for over two months for external review without receiving any feedback, and the third and fourth submissions ended in failure. Finally, I wish everyone success in publishing more papers!!!

大武当 2023-05-17

2022.12.31?Submission
2023.2.15?Rejected, Minor revisions, Two reviewers, Five comments in total
2023.2.19?Resubmission
2023.3.27?Accepted
2023.3.28?Submit Final Files
2023.4.07?Payment, 1755?
2023.5.17?Publication

jinjin826 2023-05-17

Hello, original poster, have you received the feedback from the first review?

jinjin826 2023-05-17

Hello, may I ask if the content of the two reminder replies is the same?

swz 2023-05-16

What is called external auditing? After submission, it has been under review.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search