不争，，，， 2021-09-07

First instance one month, second instance on July 14th. I submitted it, the result is unknown. Who knows how much longer we have to wait. Is it really this slow now? It's delaying things.

爱吃煎饼 2021-09-05

The first SCI, commemorating it.

xixi123456 2021-09-03

Because in the end, I was betrayed by my own people and didn't win! I relied entirely on myself and wrote another article, so I dare to say, do you understand?!

小奇奇想教书 2021-09-03

The boss received the review comments after more than 40 days. (╥﹏╥) I was only notified to enter the review on August 27th.

小奇奇想教书 2021-09-03

August 25th: Post and distribute ADM EIC.
August 27th: Receive email notification that it is under review.
Feeling nervous...

jessie 2021-09-02

8.16 resubmit = Please submit again by August 16th.
8.17 under review = Currently being reviewed as of August 17th.

drrrrr 2021-08-31

It's not all garbage.

CloverKong 2021-08-30

2021.3.30 submit, under review
2021.7.4 Suggested resubmission, three reviewers, two accept, one reject, more than ten comments, helpful for improving the article
2021.8.1 Resubmit, under review
2021.8.24 Accept

The review process is slower now compared to before. This is my first SCI publication and I am very happy. The reviewers' comments are constructive. I hope the journal continues to improve!

gumpsky 2021-08-29

Modify the text just sent. This submission took a total of 4 months, starting from April 20th when it was submitted. Two weeks later, the feedback received suggested that the submission was not in the correct field and recommended resubmitting. On May 4th, it was resubmitted and on May 20th, the review feedback was received. The primary reviewer accepted minor revisions, while the secondary reviewer refused to allow resubmission, instead requiring extensive revisions and grammar corrections. In total, the two reviewers raised over 10 questions, some of which were quite critical. Due to some delays caused by personal matters, additional experiments were conducted, and the manuscript was polished by a professional organization. On August 17th, the revised submission was resubmitted with a trial mindset. Surprisingly, the review feedback was received quickly, with one reviewer stating that there were no further issues, while the other provided two specific questions and clarified that they were not the same reviewer as before. Upon this submission, it was evident that the questions raised by the reviewers were indeed problematic areas in the article. Regardless of what others may say, I have always been involved in applied and engineering work, and have self-taught computer science. Currently, under significant research pressure and eager to publish, I chose this journal and overall, I find it to be quite serious and not as others have described.

gumpsky 2021-08-29

The speed is fast, the reviewers are not particularly professional, but there are many problems.

SpaceshipZ 2021-08-19

Do you consider publicly admitting that you wrote the review comments as a self-explosion?

W.wenbo 2021-08-13

Posted on April 21, 2021;
Received first-round comments on May 5, 2021. (One rejection and one acceptance, editor's opinion was to resubmit)
Redid the experiment and made revisions based on the review comments on May 31, 2021, then resubmitted.
Received second-round comments on June 5, 2021. (Two reviewers' opinions were acceptance, while one additional reviewer's opinion was rejection with resubmission, editor's opinion was to resubmit)
Made revisions based on the third reviewer's comments and resubmitted on July 7, 2021.
Accepted on August 11, 2021.
Overall, the reviewers' comments were fair and helpful in improving the article.

my010 2021-08-11

The reviewers are very responsible and provide professional questions. Starting from the opinions of the reviewers, conducting research has been very helpful for the article. Previously, I saw many people criticizing this journal heavily, possibly due to spamming, but not all articles are spam. Many experts are quite serious and responsible. It is very helpful for those who are initially submitting to SCI because the review process is fast, and modifying the article based on the given opinions is highly efficient. I strongly recommend using this journal as a starting point for SCI.

JAYF 2021-08-08

I haven't received any feedback on my revisions for the past two months. I don't know what's going on. I've been pushing for a response, but there has been no reply. Is it always this slow now?

16888KB 2021-08-08

Posted on May 21, 2021.
Received first-round comments on June 4, 2021 (all three reviewers rejected it, but the editor allowed resubmission).
Revised and polished the English based on the reviewer's comments, and submitted it on July 1, 2021.
Received response on July 31, 2021, and got accepted! Then paid the fee, finalized the manuscript, and waiting for publication.

提醒我搞科研 2021-08-06

Submitted on 7.10, ADM assigned on 7.15, returned with review comments on 8.6. There were three reviewers: one rejected the submission outright, one suggested resubmission after revision, and one accepted with minor revisions. The second reviewer's comments were very fair and detailed, providing thorough feedback.

好名字 2021-08-05

20 days, four reviewers, recommend revising and resubmitting.

Leoung 2021-08-05

Reviewed three times, each time recommended for resubmission. It has been a total of 6 months since the first submission, and the third review took three months. I have sent reminders three times, and the first two times they asked me to be patient. On July 26th, I couldn't bear it anymore and sent reminders to the editor-in-chief and the associate editor. The editor-in-chief asked me to wait, but surprisingly, within half an hour, I received the review result. It is worth mentioning that all of my editors are Indians.

努力奋斗的科研汪 2021-08-02

4.10 Submission
4.16 Under review
7.4 Re-submitted after editing, 5 reviewers, one major revision, one minor revision, one acceptance, 2 English grammar issues.
The speed of this journal is too slow now, so I will not submit to this journal after making the revisions.

Yingjie Zhou 2021-07-27

I also applied on June 11th, and still haven't received any news.

提醒我搞科研 2021-07-27

Wow, is it this slow? I've been waiting for over twenty days and still haven't received any news.

jessie 2021-07-26

6.11 Submission
6.15 Notification of entering the review process
7.26 Two reviewers, one suggested rejection with revisions, the other suggested minor revisions. After considering both suggestions, revised manuscript needs to be resubmitted.

游客 2021-07-26

Distributed, then sent an email saying it has been sent for review.

Leoung 2021-07-26

Is the speed already this slow? Submitted on May 4th, accepted on May 11th, and it still hasn't been reviewed. I have sent two reminders in between, but they only said to be patient and wait.

fsdsdf13542 2021-07-25

Hello friend, what is PPNA? Which journal is it from and in which field? Thank you.

mosit 2021-07-23

Excuse me, has your assignment been edited?

脸皮不是很厚 2021-07-23

I have already received the email, one is for revision and resubmission, and the other one is a direct rejection. The editor directly rejected it, and I feel tired-hearted.

JAYF 2021-07-22

It has been more than a month since the modification, and there is still no news. Is it really this slow now?

游客 2021-07-20

After submitting, it will be under review, without an assigned ADM. How many days does it usually take to assign an ADM and send it for review?

归零，开始 2021-07-19

Brother, how long will it take for you to produce the results?