友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
Atmospheric Research
ATMOS RES
ISSN / eISSN
0169-8095
目标和范围
The journal publishes scientific papers (research papers, review articles, letters and notes) dealing with the part of the atmosphere where meteorological events occur. Attention is given to all processes extending from the earth surface to the tropopause, but special emphasis continues to be devoted to the physics of clouds, mesoscale meteorology and air pollution, i.e. atmospheric aerosols; microphysical processes; cloud dynamics and thermodynamics; numerical simulation, climatology, climate change and weather modification.
研究方向
气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.40
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Atmospheric Science | Q1 | #14/148 |
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | 分区 |
---|---|
METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES | Q1 |
H-index
85
出版国家或地区
NETHERLANDS
出版商
Elsevier BV
出版周期
Semimonthly
出版年份
1986
年文章数
479
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710
认证评论
I'm really frustrated. The editor's comments were actually present in the original version, but the editor didn't mention them at first. They waited until after two rounds of major revisions to mention them and then directly rejected the paper! If the editor wanted to reject it or had any concerns, why didn't they reject it earlier? I can only describe this journal and editor as infuriating, completely wasting people's precious time! I'm not a sensitive person, it's normal for articles to be rejected, but I strongly advise everyone to be cautious about submitting to this journal - you never know when a desk reject will arrive.
Alright, brothers, I'm really angry. I'm going to leave a review on other journal platforms as well. I need to vent this frustration!
Received on August 26, 2021
After two minor revisions, the first revision was actually more like a major revision. Some experiments were added and after the revision, one of the reviewers directly agreed to accept it. The second revision was still minor, and after 3 days of modification, it was returned and accepted by the editor on the third day.
The reviewers were quite professional and asked detailed questions. The overall speed of the editorial process was fast. The requirements for innovation and language were satisfactory. It is my first paper in life, and I will continue to submit in the future if I have the opportunity.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started