友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
IEEE T SMART GRID
ISSN / eISSN
1949-3053
目标和范围
The IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid is a cross disciplinary and internationally archival journal aimed at disseminating results of research on smart grid that relates to, arises from, or deliberately influences energy generation, transmission, distribution and delivery. The journal publishes original research on theories and development on principles of smart grid technologies and systems. The Transactions also welcomes manuscripts on design, implementation and evaluation of power systems that are affected by smart grid. Surveys of existing work on smart grid may also be considered for publication when they propose a new viewpoint on history and a challenging perspective on the future of smart grid.
研究方向
工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
22.10
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Computer Science - General Computer Science | Q1 | #6/232 |
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | 分区 |
---|---|
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC | Q1 |
H-index
121
出版国家或地区
UNITED STATES
出版商
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
年文章数
394
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
认证评论
(1) 05/04/22: Initial submission of the paper;
(2) 05/11/22: Rejected after initial review: the editor pointed out issues with the expression of the paper;
(3) 05/20/22: Resubmitted after making modifications based on the initial review comments;
(4) 08/09/22: First round of revise and resubmit: there were a total of four reviewers, each with around 10 questions. Some questions were difficult to answer, some required explanations, and others needed additional simulations. Additionally, there was a request to modify the introduction, body, formulas, and overall structure of the paper. The reviewers truly demonstrated their expertise by identifying many issues in the content and expression! So, I carefully consulted relevant literature, replied to each comment diligently, and incorporated the explanations into the paper. Finally, I asked other members of the research group to read and help with the overall manuscript, aiming to eliminate any language and formatting issues.
(5) 09/29/22: Returned for revision after the first review; the revised manuscript and modification explanations combined reached nearly 60 pages.
(6) 11/12/22: Accept; upon receiving the email, I felt pleasantly surprised yet also thought that it all made sense. After all, during those days of revising the paper, I worked diligently, carefully read the comments, searched for references, derived and completed formulas, and made necessary revisions. In short, hard work pays off!
A total of 5 reviewers were involved, and it was noticed that one of the reviewers had a background purely in electrical engineering, while I can only be considered to have a background in power grids. The review process took approximately 2-3 months each time, with 60 days given for revisions, which could be extended upon request.
After the first round of revisions, three out of the five reviewers had no further comments. The remaining two reviewers had one proposing new questions and the other requesting a comparative experiment. However, we did not conduct the comparative experiment in the second round.
Finally, it was accepted after three more months.
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now