友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
IEEE T CYBERNETICS
ISSN / eISSN
2168-2267 / 2168-2275
目标和范围
The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics includes computational approaches to the field of cybernetics. Specifically, the transactions welcomes papers on communication and control across machines or machine, human, and organizations. The scope includes such areas as computational intelligence, computer vision, neural networks, genetic algorithms, machine learning, fuzzy systems, cognitive systems, decision making, and robotics, to the extent that they contribute to the theme of cybernetics or demonstrate an application of cybernetics principles.
研究方向
自动化与控制系统
计算机:人工智能
计算机:控制论
CiteScore
25.40
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Engineering - Control and Systems Engineering | Q1 | #2/321 |
Engineering - Computer Science Applications | Q1 | #6/817 |
Engineering - Information Systems | Q1 | #5/394 |
Engineering - Electrical and Electronic Engineering | Q1 | #10/797 |
Engineering - Software | Q1 | #8/407 |
Engineering - Human-Computer Interaction | Q1 | #6/145 |
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | 分区 |
---|---|
AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS | Q1 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | Q1 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS | Q1 |
H-index
81
出版国家或地区
UNITED STATES
出版商
IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity
出版周期
Monthly
出版年份
2013
年文章数
317
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC , 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
认证评论
In the first round, it took three and a half months, with a reject and resubmit decision.
Before the second round of submission, the editor-in-chief was replaced. The second round of review took three months, including three weeks for EIC decision, resulting in a rejection.
Among the three reviewers in the second round, two had positive opinions, while the other one did not provide any new opinions compared to the first round. However, the editor-in-chief directly rejected the submission, citing the same reasons mentioned by others, stating that only the very top quality and highly relevant submissions could be accepted due to a high number of submissions. During the argument process via email, the editor-in-chief even fabricated some reasons that the reviewers never mentioned, claiming that the reviewers declined the submission for these reasons. Therefore, it seems that the editor-in-chief rejected the submission based purely on personal preference. Additionally, the editor-in-chief's actions were not in accordance with standard procedures, as they did not check the cover letter. When responding to this issue during the argument, they evaded the topic.
In summary, the current journal is unfriendly, and acceptance seems to depend solely on the editor-in-chief's mood, resembling a lottery. The review period is also relatively slow.
2020-09-13 submitted
2021-03-21 reject and resubmit
2021-05-15 accept as regular paper
The whole process was quite frustrating. Our project was about multiphase flow and signal processing, which has already produced four papers, including ones with an impact factor of 10+. It was difficult to accept the direct rejection after a 6-month review (so unfair...). Later, I found out that this seems to be a common practice in IEEE... The evaluation scores during rejection were one good, one fair, one minor revision, and one poor. Looking back, it is true that the version still needed some polishing. Along with the other authors, we worked day and night (after all, we can't expect the professors to stay up late, unfortunately) for over a month, completely revising the entire article. We even made additions and changes to the experimental section, reaching over 80%+. Unfortunately, due to the pandemic, communication with the professor was delayed from Christmas until March (helpless). After resubmission, it took a month to become "awaiting EIC decision." After about two weeks, my colleague suddenly excitedly informed me that it had been accepted, without any further revisions needed (shocked).
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started