友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
PATTERN RECOGNITION
PATTERN RECOGN
ISSN / eISSN
0031-3203
目标和范围
For over 40 years, Pattern Recognition has provided the primary forum for the exchange of information on pattern recognition research among the many varied engineering, mathematical and applied professions which make up this unique field. Original papers cover all methods, techniques and applications of pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, image processing, 2-D and 3-D matching, expert systems and robotics. The Journal also includes reviews of significant developments in the field.
研究方向
计算机:人工智能
工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
14.40
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Computer Science - Signal Processing | Q1 | #9/131 |
Computer Science - Software | Q1 | #30/407 |
Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition | Q1 | #10/106 |
Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence | Q1 | #33/350 |
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | 分区 |
---|---|
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | Q1 |
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC | Q1 |
H-index
180
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Elsevier Ltd
出版周期
Monthly
出版年份
1968
年文章数
785
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
认证评论
First review 2021.1.19 with comments returned. Major revisions (two months deadline for modifications). Returned on 3.18.
Second review 6.9 with comments returned. Major revisions (two months deadline for modifications). Returned on 7.12.
Third review 9.22 with comments returned. Minor revisions (one month deadline for modifications). Returned on 10.12.
Fourth review 11.18 with comments returned. Minor revisions and editorial decision (one month deadline for modifications). Returned on 11.26.
Accepted on 12.2.
In the first round, there were three reviewers named A, B, and C, all of whom were very professional. Two reviewers (A and C) requested additional experiments, while reviewer B mainly focused on the rigor of the symbol system. This was the first time seeing B's reviewing method of making annotations on the PDF, with a total of over twenty comments.
In the second round, reviewers B and C continued to focus on the rigor of the symbol system, as well as requesting detailed explanations of certain viewpoints in the main text. Reviewer B provided over twenty comments, while reviewer C suggested extending the proposed method to other tasks.
In the third round, reviewer B continued to focus on the rigor of the symbol system, as well as requesting detailed explanations of certain results in the experimental section.
In the fourth round, reviewer B made minor corrections for typos. The editor-in-chief requested reducing the references to conferences and arXiv and increasing the references to journal articles.
Overall, the quality of the article improved significantly. Encountering reviewers like B is indeed rare, and although it was challenging, it truly pushed for excellence in the quality of the article.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started