Journal of Neural Engineering

期刊名
Journal of Neural Engineering

J NEURAL ENG

ISSN / eISSN
1741-2560
目标和范围
The goal of Journal of Neural Engineering (JNE) is to act as a forum for the interdisciplinary field of neural engineering where neuroscientists, neurobiologists and engineers can publish their work in one periodical that bridges the gap between neuroscience and engineering. The journal publishes articles in the field of neural engineering at the molecular, cellular and systems levels.

The scope of the journal encompasses experimental, computational, theoretical, clinical and applied aspects of: Innovative neurotechnology; Brain-machine (computer) interface; Neural interfacing; Bioelectronic medicines; Neuromodulation; Neural prostheses; Neural control; Neuro-rehabilitation; Neurorobotics; Optical neural engineering; Neural circuits: artificial & biological; Neuromorphic engineering; Neural tissue regeneration; Neural signal processing; Theoretical and computational neuroscience; Systems neuroscience; Translational neuroscience; Neuroimaging.
研究方向

工程:生物医学

神经科学

CiteScore
7.80 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Engineering - Biomedical Engineering Q1 #70/303
Engineering - Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience Q2 #28/97
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2024) 分区
ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Q2
NEUROSCIENCES Q2
H-index
89
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
IOP Publishing Ltd.
出版周期
Quarterly
出版年份
2004
年文章数
285
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
IOP PUBLISHING LTD, DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
The journal is definitely a good journal, not to mention the content, the requirements for English language, writing style, and format are all very strict. The opinions of the two reviewers mainly focus on the format and grammar issues in lengthy discussions. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on innovation, and if there are similar papers, it is important to highlight one's own innovative aspects. But to be honest, the two reviewers are probably not experts in this field, as they have no substantial constructive suggestions for my methodology. One of them also has a bad attitude, maybe because the paper did not leave a good impression on him. In conclusion, it is still a challenging journal, and I need to improve myself to meet its standards.
2022-02-27
The review process is fast, with feedback given within two months. There were two reviewers, one being highly professional and providing many suggestions, while the other seemed less thorough. Strangely, both reviewers seemed to have access to each other's comments and raised similar questions. Overall, the efficiency of the journal is very high, and the impact factor has increased this year. It is worth submitting to.
2021-07-23

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started