友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING
IMAGE VISION COMPUT
ISSN / eISSN
0262-8856
目标和范围
Image and Vision Computing has as a primary aim the provision of an effective medium of interchange for the results of high quality theoretical and applied research fundamental to all aspects of image interpretation and computer vision. The journal publishes work that proposes new image interpretation and computer vision methodology or addresses the application of such methods to real world scenes. It seeks to strengthen a deeper understanding in the discipline by encouraging the quantitative comparison and performance evaluation of the proposed methodology. The coverage includes: image interpretation, scene modelling, object recognition and tracking, shape analysis, monitoring and surveillance, active vision and robotic systems, SLAM, biologically-inspired computer vision, motion analysis, stereo vision, document image understanding, character and handwritten text recognition, face and gesture recognition, biometrics, vision-based human-computer interaction, human activity and behavior understanding, data fusion from multiple sensor inputs, image databases.
研究方向
计算机:理论方法
计算机:人工智能
计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
7.30
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition | Q1 | #23/100 |
Computer Science - Signal Processing | Q1 | #29/122 |
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
---|---|
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - SCIE | Q2 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING - SCIE | Q1 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS - SCIE | Q1 |
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE | Q2 |
OPTICS - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
118
出版国家或地区
NETHERLANDS
出版商
Elsevier Ltd
出版周期
Monthly
年文章数
155
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
认证评论
As for your situation, it is possible that among the 5 papers you submitted, the remaining three did not agree and did not meet the required number of reviewers, so the editor sent another batch. If the feedback that comes back is not good (assuming it is a reject), the assistant editor should directly reject it for you. So, I guess it is still the normal process, but the reviewers may be too busy.
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now