友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
ENG FRACT MECH
ISSN / eISSN
0013-7944
目标和范围
EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
研究方向
力学
CiteScore
8.70
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Engineering - Mechanical Engineering | Q1 | #74/672 |
Engineering - Mechanics of Materials | Q1 | #53/398 |
Engineering - General Materials Science | Q1 | #86/463 |
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | 分区 |
---|---|
MECHANICS | Q1 |
H-index
106
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Elsevier BV
出版周期
Semimonthly
出版年份
1968
年文章数
624
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
认证评论
Initial Date Submitted: Dec 25, 2021
Under Review: Jan 28, 2022
Major Revision: Mar 15, 2022
There were a total of four reviewers, two minor revisions, one major revision, and one rejection. We were given two months to make revisions. The reviewers' comments were very professional, and they carefully reviewed the derivation of some mathematical formulas. They provided many constructive suggestions for improvement, which were helpful in enhancing the quality of the article (even from the reviewer who gave the rejection).
In early May, we submitted the revised version. The reviewer who requested the major revision agreed to publish, and the reviewer who requested the minor revision asked us to add some discussions.
After submitting in early June, the editor agreed to accept and publish.
Overall impression: The editor's processing time was a bit long, but they had good control over the modifications made to the article (such as which reviewers to send the revised manuscript to). Most of the reviewers' comments were professional, making it worth submitting!
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search