DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY

Got two articles accepted and helped review one. The speed was quite fast, and luck played a significant role.
The first article underwent major revisions twice and minor revisions once before finally being accepted. It took two months for it to be published.
The second article went through one major revision and was accepted the next day after modifications. It took a month and a half, but it hasn't been published yet.
The article I reviewed was from a university in Beijing. There were too many flaws, and even the empirical evidence was incorrect. Despite trying to accumulate research points, I had to recommend major revisions. However, another reviewer rejected it, and the editor-in-chief decided to reject it as well. I would like to express my apologies to the scholar, but I couldn't recommend minor revisions.
I hope the journal continues to thrive and doesn't get shut down.

Two reviewers reviewed the paper very carefully and provided four pages of comments. It took nearly a month to make the necessary revisions. After two rounds of revisions, the paper was accepted. Overall, it is now necessary to have some level of innovation in order to be accepted.