Embryonic genetics continues to provide amazing insights, confirming that genetic transmission of phenotypes is endlessly complex with processes that are largely unknown.
An excellent example of how long-standing surveillance systems coupled with intentional, international collaboration can produce stable estimates of outcomes.
This is nicely written, well-powered, and an important question. One improvement cuold have been including a brief definition of "ultra processed foods."
It is always astonishing how much is expected among clergy--particularly African American clergy. It is not astonishing that clergy do not want to provide more interpersonal counseling--this is almost always free, and not necessarily the point of being a minister to a congregation.
This is an important study using a publicly available dataset, and I like this journal's practice of giving highlights at the beginning. However, it would have been improved if the abstract indicated the range of possible HRQoL scores.
I do not understand this sentence in the abstract: " Of the 104 cases, the patients for 93 cases (89%) were completely satisfied or satisfied with minor reservations." Patients = cases.
More human studies are needed to evaluate whether rye breads are beneficial in lowering glucose conversion among diabetics, as this would be an acceptable and easily-obtained alternative for most western individuals.
This timely study with high statistical power (N=>23,000) addresses an interaction about which little is known--age at menarche and menopause--and its effect on incident diabetes. The results are worrisome, as higher BMI also seems to interact in a way that increases risk of DM2.
"The debate on the benefit-risk balance of primary cardiovascular prevention with aspirin has been especially vivacious over the past two years . . ." What an unusual use for the word "vivacious!" Evidently the authors meant "lively." It would be a more useful abstract if it had included some indication of what the review found.
论文