4.7 Article

A graph-based relevance feedback mechanism in content-based image retrieval

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 254-264

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.10.009

Keywords

NSCT; Content based image retrieval; Re-ranking; Relevance feedback; Feature evaluation index

Funding

  1. Machine Intelligence Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata-108 (Internal Academic Project)
  2. Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) is an important problem in the domain of digital data management. There is indeed a growing availability of images, but unfortunately the traditional metadata-based search systems are unable to properly exploit their visual information content. In this article we introduce a novel CBIR scheme that abstracts each image in the database in terms of statistical features computed using the Multi-scale Geometric Analysis (MGA) of Non-subsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT). Noise resilience is one of the main advantages of this feature representation. To improve the retrieval performance and reduce the semantic gap, our system incorporates a Relevance Feedback (RF) mechanism that uses a graph-theoretic approach to rank the images in accordance with the user's feedback. First, a graph of images is constructed with edges reflecting the similarity of pairs of images with respect to the proposed feature representation. Then, images are ranked at each feedback round in terms of the probability that a random walk on this graph reaches an image tagged as relevant by the user before hitting a non-relevant one. Experimental analyses on three different databases show the effectiveness of our algorithm compared to state-of-the-art approaches in particular when the images are corrupted with different types of noise. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available