4.4 Article

Multiple myeloma and infections: a population-based study on 9253 multiple myeloma patients

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 107-113

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.107714

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Stockholm County Council
  3. Karolinska Institutet Foundations
  4. Goteborg Medical Society
  5. Sahlgrenska University Hospital Foundations
  6. Roche
  7. Blodcancerfonden
  8. University of Iceland Research Fund
  9. Icelandic Centre for Research (RANNIS)
  10. Landspitali University Hospital research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple myeloma. To estimate the risk of bacterial and viral infections in multiple myeloma patients, we used population-based data from Sweden to identify all multiple myeloma patients (n=9253) diagnosed from 1988 to 2004 with follow up to 2007 and 34,931 matched controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of infections. Overall, multiple myeloma patients had a 7-fold (hazard ratio =7.1; 95% confidence interval =6.8-7.4) risk of developing any infection compared to matched controls. The increased risk of developing a bacterial infection was 7-fold (7.1; 6.8-7.4), and for viral infections 10-fold (10.0; 8.9-11.4). Multiple myeloma patients diagnosed in the more recent calendar periods had significantly higher risk of infections compared to controls (P<0.001). At one year of follow up, infection was the underlying cause in 22% of deaths in multiple myeloma patients. Mortality due to infections remained constant during the study period. Our findings confirm that infections represent a major threat to multiple myeloma patients. The effect on infectious complications due to novel drugs introduced in the treatment of multiple myeloma needs to be established and trials on prophylactic measures are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available