4.4 Article

Prophylaxis in congenital factor VII deficiency: indications, efficacy and safety. Results from the Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry (STER)

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 538-544

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.074039

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk and charities
  2. Novo Nordisk A/S

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of the very short half-life of factor VII, prophylaxis in factor VII deficiency is considered a difficult endeavor. The clinical efficacy and safety of prophylactic regimens, and indications for their use, were evaluated in factor VII-deficient patients in the Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry. Prophylaxis data (38 courses) were analyzed from 34 patients with severe factor VII deficiency (<1-45 years of age, 21 female). Severest phenotypes (central nervous system, gastrointestinal, joint bleeding episodes) were highly prevalent. Twenty-one patients received recombinant activated factor VII (24 courses), four received plasma-derived factor VII, and ten received fresh-frozen plasma. Prophylactic schedules clustered into frequent courses (three times weekly, n=23) and infrequent courses (<= 2 times weekly, n=15). Excluding courses for menorrhagia, frequent and infrequent courses produced 18/23 (78%) and 5/12 (41%) excellent outcomes, respectively; relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-3.79; P=0.079. Long-term prophylaxis lasted from 1 to >10 years. No thrombosis or new inhibitors occurred. In conclusion, a subset of patients with factor VII deficiency needed prophylaxis because of severe bleeding. Recombinant activated factor VII schedules based on frequent administrations (three times weekly) and a 90 mu g/kg total weekly dose were effective. These data provide a rationale for long-term, safe prophylaxis in factor VII deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available