4.4 Article

Autologous blood cell transplantation versus HLA-identical sibling transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: a registry study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 185-192

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.062059

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [24-CA76518]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  4. NHLBI [5U01HL069294]
  5. NCI
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS) [HHSH234200637015C]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-06-1-0704, N00014-08-1-0058]
  8. Allos, Inc.
  9. Amgen, Inc.
  10. Angioblast
  11. Anonymous donation
  12. Ariad
  13. Be the Match Foundation
  14. Blue Cross
  15. Blue Shield Association
  16. Buchanan Family Foundation
  17. CaridianBCT
  18. Celgene Corporation
  19. CellGenix, GmbH
  20. Children's Leukemia Research Association
  21. Fresenius-Biotech North America, Inc.
  22. Gamida Cell Teva Joint Venture Ltd.
  23. Genentech, Inc.
  24. Genzyme Corporation
  25. GlaxoSmithKline
  26. Kiadis Pharma
  27. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  28. Medical College of Wisconsin
  29. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  30. Milliman USA, Inc.
  31. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  32. National Marrow Donor Program
  33. Optum Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
  34. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  35. Seattle Genetics
  36. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  37. Soligenix, Inc.
  38. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  39. THERAKOS, Inc.
  40. Wellpoint, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optimal post-remission treatment for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission remains uncertain. Previous comparisons of autologous versus allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation noted higher relapse, but lower treatment-related mortality though using bone marrow grafts, with treatment-related mortality of 12-20%. Recognizing lower treatment-related mortality using autologous peripheral blood grafts, in an analysis of registry data from the Center for International Blood and Transplant Research, we compared treatment-related mortality, relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission (median ages 36-44, range 19-60) receiving myeloablative HLA-matched sibling donor grafts (bone marrow, n=475 or peripheral blood, n=428) versus autologous peripheral blood (n=230). The 5-year cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality was 19% (95% confidence interval, 16-23%), 20% (17-24%) and 8% (5-12%) for allogeneic bone marrow, allogeneic peripheral blood and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant recipients, respectively. The corresponding figures for 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse were 20% (17-24%), 26% (21-30%) and 45% (38-52%), respectively. At 5 years, leukemia-free survival and overall survival rates were similar: allogeneic bone marrow 61% (56-65%) and 64% (59-68%); allogeneic peripheral blood 54% (49-59%) and 59% (54-64%); autologous peripheral blood 47% (40-54%) and 54% (47-60%); P=0.13 and P=0.19, respectively. In multivariate analysis the incidence of treatment-related mortality was lower after autologous peripheral blood transplantation than after allogeneic bone marrow/peripheral blood transplants [relative risk 0.37 (0.20-0.69); P=0.001], but treatment failure (death or relapse) after autologous peripheral blood was significantly more likely [relative risk 1.32 (1.06-1.64); P=0.011]. The 5-year overall survival, however, was similar in patients who received autologous peripheral blood (n=230) [relative risk 1.23 (0.98-1.55); P=0.071] or allogeneic bone marrow/peripheral blood (n=903). In the absence of an HLA-matched sibling donor, autologous peripheral blood may provide acceptable alternative post-remission therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available