4.4 Article

The t(14;20) is a poor prognostic factor in myeloma but is associated with long-term stable disease in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages 1221-1225

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.016329

Keywords

plasma cell; myeloma; MGUS; chromosome abnormality; disease progression

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukaemia Research
  2. MRC [G0100132] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0100132] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A large series of plasma cell dyscrasias (n=2207) was examined for translocations which deregulate the MAF genes, t(14;20)(q32;q12) and t(14;16)(q32;q23), and their disease behavior was compared to a group characterized by the t(4;14)(p16;q32) where CCND2 is also up-regulated. The t(14;20) showed low prevalence in myeloma (27/1830, 1.5%) and smoldering myeloma (1/148, <1%) with a higher incidence in MGUS (9/193, 5% P=0.005). Strong associations. with del(13) (76%), non-hyperdiploidy (83%) and gain of 1q (58%) were seen but no association with an IgA M-protein or absence of bone disease was noted. All three translocations were associated with poor outcome in myeloma, but strikingly all t(14;20) MGUS/smoldering myeloma cases (n=10) had stable, low level disease. In contrast, the 10 t(14;16) and 25 t(4;14) MGUS/smoldering myeloma cases were associated with both evolving and non-evolving disease. None of the associated genetic abnormalities helped to predict for progression from MGUS or smoldering myeloma. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: ISRCTN 68454111; UKCRN ID 1176)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available