4.4 Review

Mesenchymal stem cells: the fibroblasts' new clothes?

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 258-263

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.13699

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cells; fibroblasts; graft-versus-host disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Action Medical Research Training Fellowship
  2. Leukemia Research Fund UK Bennett Senior Fellowship
  3. Tyneside Leukemia Research Fund
  4. Histiocytosis Association of America
  5. Arthritis Research Campaign and Medical Research Council
  6. Arthritis Research Campaign and Leukemia Research Fund
  7. MRC [MC_G0802523, G116/131] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G9818340B, MC_G0802523, G116/131] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells are adherent stromal cells, initially isolated from the bone marrow, characterized by their ability to differentiate into mesenchymal tissues such as bone, cartilage and fat. They have also been shown to suppress immune responses in vitro. Because of these properties, mesenchymal stem cells have recently received a very high profile. Despite the dramatic benefits reported in early phase clinical trials, their functions remain poorly understood. Particularly, several questions remain concerning the origin of mesenchymal stem cells and their relationship to other stromal cells such as fibroblasts. Whereas clear gene expression signatures are imprinted in stromal cells of different anatomical origins, the anti-proliferative effects of mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts and their potential to differentiate appear to be common features between these two cell types. In this review, we summarize recent studies in the context of historical and often neglected stromal cell literature, and present the evidence that mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts share much more in common than previously recognized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available