4.3 Article

Luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin: distinguishing unique physiologic roles

Journal

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 174-181

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2013.859670

Keywords

Function; hCG; infertility; LH; LHCGR; mutation; ovulation; polymorphism

Funding

  1. Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) are integral components of the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, which controls sexual maturation and functionality. In the absence of signaling through their shared receptor, fetal sexual differentiation and post-natal development cannot proceed normally. Although they share a high degree of homology, the physiologic roles of these hormones are unique, governed by differences in expression pattern, biopotency and regulation. Whereas LH is a key regulator of gonadal steroidogenesis and ovulation, hCG is predominantly active in pregnancy and fetal development. Emerging evidence has revealed endogenous functions not previously ascribed to hCG, including participation in ovulation and fertilization, implantation, placentation and other activities in support of successful pregnancy. Spontaneous and induced mutations in LH, hCG and their mutual receptor have contributed substantially to our understanding of reproductive development and function. The lack of naturally occurring, functionally significant mutations in the beta-subunit of hCG reinforce its putative role in establishment of pregnancy. Rescue of reproductive abnormalities resulting from aberrant gonadotropin signaling is possible in certain clinical contexts, depending on the nature of the underlying defect. By understanding the physiologic roles of LH and hCG in normal and pathologic states, we may better harness their diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available