4.3 Article

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and endometriosis: current strategies and new insights

Journal

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 314-321

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2011.650751

Keywords

Adolescent; endometrioma; endometriosis; gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues; gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists; infertility; medical treatment; pelvic pain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic inflammatory disease affecting 5% to 10% of women in reproductive age and has been reported also in adolescents. Its main clinical presentations are chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of the recently published data concerning the mechanism of action of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) as well as to analyze their role in the management of endometriosis-associated pain and infertility in addition to its value in adolescent cases. Furthermore, to provide practical recommendations and new insights based on the best available information. Methods: Systematic search was performed of the Cochrane Library and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online database looking for the different trials, reviews and various guidelines relating to GnRHas usage in the management of endometriosis-associated pain, infertility and in adolescent cases. Results: From a pathophysiological perspective, there is a growing scientific evidence that GnRHas exert its therapeutic effects by their classical pituitary downregulation and via a direct effect on the endometrial cells themselves. Accordingly, they represent an important medical option for the management of different aspects of this enigmatic disease. Conclusion: GnRHas have a valuable strategic role in treatment of endometriosis-associated pain and infertility as well as in adolescents above 16 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available