4.6 Review

Circulating and disseminated tumor cells in ovarian cancer: A systematic review

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages 632-639

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.016

Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Circulating tumor cells; Disseminated tumor cells; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Veridex LCC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Detecting circulating tumor cells (CFCs) in the peripheral blood and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow of cancer patients has proven feasible and of prognostic value in different neoplasms. However, the clinical significance of CFCs and DTCs in ovarian cancer and its association with outcome remains unclear. Methods. A literature search in PubMed was performed from January 2000 to December 2013 for studies evaluating CFCs and/or DTCs and its association with clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcome in ovarian cancer. The main outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Median study size was 84 patients (range 43-216). Median follow-up was 19 months (range 5-52). Most studies were small case series (n < 100; studies; 71%). The majority of studies used an immunophenotyping approach to identify CTCs and/or DTCs, but only 3 studies (21%) used the FDA-approved Cell Search method. Despite the differences in methodology among studies the presence of CTCs and DTCs tended to be associated with higher baseline CA-125 serum levels, higher odds of residual disease after surgery, and worse survival in ovarian cancer across studies. No consistent intra-patient correlation was observed between DTCs detected in the bone marrow and CTCs detected in the blood. Conclusions. The presence of CTCs and DTCs is associated with adverse clinicopathological characteristics and poor clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. Its implementation as a valuable prognostic tool in the clinical setting requires uniform methodology and prospective validation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available