4.6 Article

Pelvic insufficiency fractures in patients with cervical and endometrial cancer treated with postoperative pelvic radiation

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages 540-543

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.021

Keywords

Insufficiency fracture; Pelvic radiation; Endometrial cancer; Cervical cancer; IMRT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. There is an increased awareness of pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) as a potential morbidity of pelvic radiotherapy (RT). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of PIF and assess prognostic factors, including intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), in gynecologic oncology patients treated with postoperative pelvic RT. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of all patients with endometrial or cervical carcinoma who received postoperative pelvic RT at our institution during 2000-2008. Patients who received definitive or palliative RI were excluded. Results. A total of 222 patients were identified, of whom 11 (5%) developed PIF at a median time of 11.5 months (range, 5.5-87.3 months) from RI completion. The 5-year actuarial rate was 5.1% (95% CI 3.3-6.9). In patients with osteoporosis, the 5-year rate was 15.6% compared with 2.9% for those without (P = 0.01). Similarly, patients who were on prior hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) had a higher rate (14.8% vs 4.1%, P = 0.009). The median body-mass index (BMI) for patients who developed PIF was significantly lower than those who didn't (25.9 vs 27.2, P = 0.016). The rate of PIF was 4.9% whether patients received IMRT or conventional RT. Conclusions. The 5-year risk of PIF for postoperative pelvic RT in cervical and endometrial cancer is 5.1%. Women with history of osteoporosis, prior HRT, or low BMI need to be counseled about the risk of PIF. The use of IMRT did not decrease PIF, but further studies are needed to determine if a dose/volume relationship exists between RI and PIF. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available