4.6 Article

Genetic variations in EGFR and ERBB4 increase susceptibility to cervical cancer

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 2, Pages 445-450

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.113

Keywords

EGFR; ERBB4; Cervical cancer; Polymorphism; Transmission disequilibrium test

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA095713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Inherited genetic variability contributes to susceptibility to cervical cancer. We investigated the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the human epidermal growth factor receptor (ERBB) family with cervical cancer. Methods. We used the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) to look for excessive transmission of tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) in ERBB family members EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, and ERBB4 in a large sample of women with invasive and in situ cervical cancer and their biological parents (628 trios). The study used a discovery set of trios (244) analyzed by Illumina GoldenGate in which SNPs reaching a P < .05 were re-tested by TaqMan in the combined set of 628. We also explored collaborative effects of different ERBB alleles. Results. Based on single SNP TDT tests we identified 16 significant SNPs in the discover stage and six of 14 SNPs that could be assayed by TaqMan were significantly overtransmitted in women with cervical cancer in the combined replication set. Four SNPs were located in intron 1 of EGFR and two SNPs in intron 24 of ERBB4. The EGFR variants are located near multiple enhancers, silencers, and the previously identified functional common polymorphisms in intron 1. Conclusions. Our data provide evidence for the involvement of intron 1 EGFR variants and intron 24 ERBB4 variants in modulating risk for the development of in situ and invasive cervical cancer. These variants should be examined in additional populations and functional studies would be needed to confirm this hypothesis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available