Journal
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 89-93Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.09.013
Keywords
HPV; E6; E7; mRNA; HPV; OncoTect; Hybrid Capture 2; CIN
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives. Current methods for HPV screening rely on the detection of L1 DNA from high risk genotypes (HRHPV). These assays have very high negative predictive values (similar to 99%), however, the specificity and positive predictive value of HPV DNA tests for pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions (CIN 2+) is less than 50%. The purpose of this study was to compare HPV DNA with intracellular HPV E6, E7 mRNA quantification in an effort to improve the performance of cervical cancer screening. Methods. Liquid-based cervical cytology specimens collected in either PreseryCyt or SurePath were processed for routing cytology, HPV HRDNA detection by Hybrid Capture 2 and HPV E6, E7 mRNA quantification in cells using the same sample. We analyzed a total of 2049 samples including 73 with CIN 2, CIN 3, or squamous cell carcinoma by biopsy and 1694 samples from women with normal cytology. Results. The positive predictive value of HPV E6, E7 mRNA quantification in cells for CIN2+ was 78% which was greater than HPV DNA alone (43%). The specificity of HPV E6, E7 mRNA quantification was 96% based on normal cytology compared to 82% for HC2 while the specificity of HPV E6, E7 mRNA quantification based on CIN 2- histology was 85% compared to 35% for HC2. Conclusions. With similar sensitivity and greater specificity/positive predictive value, HPV E6, E7 mRNA quantification in cells is an improvement over HPV DNA for cervical cancer screening. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available