4.6 Article

Recurrence patterns and prognosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma and the potential of tyrosine kinase-inhibiting therapy

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 323-327

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.360

Keywords

Endometrial stromal sarcoma; Hormonal therapy; Targeted therapy; Recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare uterine malignancy. The current treatment approaches yield unsatisfactory results, and potential therapeutic targets need exploration. Methods. We reviewed the electronic medical records of 74 patients with low-grade ESS who had been evaluated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1995 and 2006. Using immunohistochemistry, we tested the expression of targets in paraffin-embedded tissue samples taken from 13 of the patients. Results. Forty-seven patients (64%) had a recurrence, and 16 (22%) had died of their disease at last follow-up. The 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 43% (median PFS duration, 108 months), and the overall survival (OS) rate was 85% (median OS, 288 months). Patients who received hormonal therapy had an overall response rate of 27%; another 53% had stable disease, with a median time to progression of 24 months. No complete response or partial response was observed among patients who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy. In the paraffin-embedded specimens we tested, c-abl was expressed universally. Expression of PDGF-alpha, PDGF-beta, VEGF, and c-Kit was detected in 33%, 36%, 54%, and 8%, of specimens, respectively. EGFR and HER-2 were not detectable in any specimens. Conclusions. Our study suggests that ESS is a hormone-dependent malignancy, with hormonal therapy having activity in recurrent disease. Targeted therapy, specifically targeting c-abl may be a potential treatment for this disease. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available