4.6 Article

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and vaginal radical trachelectomy for fertility-sparing treatment in women affected by cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB-IIA1)

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 484-490

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.010

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Fertility sparing treatment; Vaginal radical trachelectomy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. The aim of the present report is to support the feasibility and the safety of a new fertility-sparing treatment in young women affected by bulky cervical cancer. Methods. Between February 2007 and October 2010, seven patients presenting large IB-IIA1 tumors (3045 mm) were scheduled for conservative treatment. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT). Results. One patient presented hematological toxicity during NACT (grade 3). All patients showed complete disappearance of tumor (n =4/7) or partial response (a 50% or more decrease in total tumor size, n = 3/7) to neoadjuvant treatment, and they were all treated with pelvic lymphadenectomy and VRT. Additional treatment (interstitial brachytherapy) was offered to only one woman because of a persistent parametrial tumoral lesion. After a mean follow tip of 22 months (range 5-49), no relapse was observed. To date, only one woman in our study attempted to conceive and she is currently pregnant. Conclusions. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for fertility sparing treatment is an innovative approach which is potentially quite interesting for many young women affected by bulky cervical cancer. These women, i.e. those with tumors larger than 2 cm (2 5 cm), are traditionally not offered fertility sparing treatment, thus the preliminary data we report here might have a promising impact. Nevertheless, for these patients it may be suitable to use the more radical, and time-tested. conservative surgical approach to allow for a complete and conservative excision of the residual tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. Studies with a larger number of patients and adequate follow-up are required to validate this conservative approach and to define clearly the good indications for this treatment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available