4.6 Article

Treatment of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma with aromatase inhibitors

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages 424-429

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.064

Keywords

Uterine leiomyosarcoma; Aromatase inhibitor

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA008748] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Aromatase inhibitors are sometimes used in the treatment of selected patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS), but there are few data assessing the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in this setting. Methods. We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review of patients with uterine LMS treated with an aromatase inhibitor at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1998 and 2008. We assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response among patients with measurable disease and explored the correlation of hormone reccptor Status With Outcome, Results. Forty patients with advanced or recurrent uterine LMS were treated with aromatase inhibitors. Thirty-four patients had measurable disease. Hormone receptor Status for these patients was as follows: estrogen receptor (ER) positive-22, ER negative-9, ER unknown-3, progesterone receptor (PR) positive-10, PR negative-10, PR unknown-14. Aromatase inhibitors used were letrozole (in 74% of patients), anastrozole (21%), and exemestane (6%). Median PFS was 2.9 months (95% Cl: 1.8-5.1). The 1-year PFS rate was 28% (95% Cl: 11-48%) for ER and/or PR positive uterine LMS. Best objective response was partial response (PR) ill 31134 patients (9%) (all of whom were ER positive). Conclusions. In this population of patients with mostly low-volume and ER positive uterine LMS, aromatase inhibitors achieved objective response in only 9%. Relatively prolonged PFS was observed among ER positive uterine LMS patients. In the absence of a no-treatment control group, the prolonged PFS cannot be attributed solely to the activity of the aromatase inhibitor treatment since it may reflect the underlying biology Of low-volume, ER positive uterine LMS. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available