4.6 Article

Sustained progression-free survival with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 115, Issue 3, Pages 396-400

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.032

Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Chemotherapy; Biologics; Monoclonal antibodies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To determine efficacy, toxicity, and survival in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) receiving combination of weekly paclitaxel and biweekly bevacizumab (PB). Methods. We reviewed chemotherapy logs identifying all patients receiving combination PB. Toxicities were graded using CTCAEv3.0 criteria. Response Fates (RR) were measured using RECIST criteria OF by CA-125 levels per modified Rustin criteria. RR and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined and plotted using Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis. Results. Fifty-one patients receiving at least two cycles of chemotherapy were evaluable for survival and 55 patients receiving one cycle of PB were evaluable in toxicity analysis. The mean number of previous regimens was four. The overall median PFS was 7 months and median OS was 12 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 60% (CR 25% and PR 35%). Median PFS for complete and partial responders were 14 and 5 months respectively. Stable disease was seen in 26% with median PFS of 6 months. Thirteen experienced treatment delays for a variety of factors. The most G3/4 toxicities were fatigue (16%), hematologic (9%) and neurotoxicity (7%). Three patients (5%) experienced bowel perforations. Conclusions: Combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab is feasible and demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile and a high response rate. These observations Should be useful in planning future clinical trials with this combination therapy. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available