4.0 Article

Ethnic-Specific Spectrum of GJB2 and SLC26A4 Mutations: Their Origin and a Literature Review

Journal

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 61S-76S

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0003489415575060

Keywords

GJB2; SLC26A4; mutation spectrum; c.35delG; c.235delC; p.H723R; Y-chromosome

Funding

  1. Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan [H24-Nanchitou(Nan)-Ippan-032]
  2. Comprehensive Research on Disability Health and Welfare from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan [H25-Kankaku-Ippan-002]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [22249057]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22249057] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The mutation spectrum of the GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes, the 2 most common genes causing deafness, are known to be ethnic specific. In this study, the spectrum of the reported GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutations in different populations are reviewed and considered from a human migration perspective. Methods: Fifty-two and 17 articles on GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutations, respectively, were reviewed through the PubMed database from April 1996 to September 2014. The 4 most prevalent mutations were selected and compared. A cluster analysis was subsequently performed for these selected mutations. Results: The present review of frequent mutations shows the ethnic-specific GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutation spectrum. A cluster analysis of the GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes revealed similarities between ethnic populations. Conclusion: The mutation spectrum reviewed in this study clearly indicated that the frequent mutations in the GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes are consistent with the founder mutation hypothesis. A comparison with the Y-chromosome phylogenetic tree indicated that these mutations may have occurred during human migration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available