4.6 Article

Combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 461-466

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.011

Keywords

Gemcitabine; Bevacizumab; Platinum; Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer; Bevacizumab; Bowel perforation

Funding

  1. Genentech, Inc and Eli Lilly, Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To describe the response rate (RR), progression-free Survival (PFS), and toxicity profile of combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab (GPB) for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods. A chart review of all patients with recurrent EOC who were treated with D1, D15 GPB in a 28-day cycle at a single institution was performed. Standard doses were gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) or carboplatin AUC 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. All patients were analyzed for toxicity. RR and PFS were assessed in all patients who received at least 2 cycles of GPB. Results. Thirty-five patients were identified, and 33 received at least 2 cycles of GPB. The majority of patients (80%) were platinum sensitive. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of GPB (range 1-24). Sixteen patients (48%) had a complete response (CR), and 10 patients (30%) had a partial response (PR), for a total RR of 78%. An additional 5 patients (15%) had stable disease, and only 2 (6%) patients had progressive disease. The median overall PFS was 12 months (95% CI 7-15), with a median follow-up time of 10 months (2-22). Two patients (6%) had bowel perforations, and both survived. Hematologic toxicities were most common, with 29% and 14% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia respectively. Conclusions. The combination of GPB demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment of recurrent EOC. However, serious toxicities Occurred, and the safety profile of this combination requires further study. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available