4.6 Article

P16 alterations increase the metastatic potential of endometrial carcinoma

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 365-371

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.037

Keywords

P16; Endometrial carcinoma; Hypermethylation; Gene alteration; Metastasis

Funding

  1. BMBF [01ZZ0407]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of p16 in tumorigenesis of endometrial carcinoma (EC). Methods. Expression of p16 protein was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. The methylation status of p16 promoter region was determined by methylation-specific PCR. Deletion analysis of the p16 gene was performed by PCR-analyses. Results. Aberrant protein expression of p16 was observed in 18 of 46 (39.2%) ECs and correlated significantly with p16 alterations, including gene deletions in 26 of 46 (56.5%) ECs and promoter hypermethylation in 8 of 46 (17.4%) ECs (p<0.001). A significant increase in the frequency of p16 alterations from early stage (I-II) to advanced stage (III-IV) ECs was observed (p = 0.002). There was no significant correlation between p 16 protein expression and the clinico-pathological features of EC. The development of metastases correlated significantly with the frequency of p16 alterations: p16 alterations were detected in 14 of 15 (93.3%) PTs with metastases and in only 18 of 31 (58.1%) PTs without metastases (p=0.018). The genetic comparison of 15 primary ECs and their paired metastases revealed that in most of the cases the deleted region of p16 gene remains the same or becomes larger during the progression from primary tumor to its corresponding metastases. Conclusion. Our results suggest that p16 alterations and particularly p16 gene deletions in ECs are associated with increased incidence of metastases. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available