4.8 Article

Anti-tumour necrosis factor agents reduce non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small bowel injury in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Journal

GUT
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 409-414

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304713

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23590924] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The role of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) in the pathogenesis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced small intestinal damage remains unclear. We evaluated the preventive effect of anti-TNF therapy against NSAID-induced enteropathy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Design Capsule endoscopy was performed in 95 consecutive RA patients who received NSAID for more than 3 months, with or without anti-TNF therapy over a period of 3 months. The findings were scored from 0 to 4: 0, normal; 1, red spots; 2, one to four erosions; 3, more than four erosions; and 4, large erosions/ulcers. The relationship between the use of anti-TNF therapy and the risk of severe damage (scores 3 or 4) or the most severe damage (score 4) was assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, a propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce the effects of TNF selection bias. Results By stratifying the patients on the basis of anti-TNF therapy, we obtained crude OR of 0.23 for severe damage (95% CI 0.09 to 0.65) and 0.37 for the most severe damage (95% CI 0.16 to 0.86). This protective effect of anti-TNF therapy remained robust to adjustments for baseline characteristics, with the adjusted OR for severe damage and the most severe damage ranging from 0.23 to 0.26 and 0.06 to 0.41, respectively. Propensity score matching yielded similar results and showed the protective effects of anti-TNF therapy against severe and most severe damage. Conclusions Anti-TNF therapy may protect against NSAID-induced small intestinal damage in RA patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available