4.7 Article

Obesity, metabolic health, and the risk of end-stage renal disease

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages 1216-1222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.384

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; inflammation; insulin resistance; lipids; nutrition; obesity

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [U01 NS041588]
  2. National Institutes of Health [U01 NS041588, R03DK095005, R01NS080850]
  3. Amgen Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obesity is associated with chronic kidney disease progression. Whether metabolic risk factors modify this association is unclear. Here we examined associations of body mass index (BMI) and metabolic health with risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Among 21,840 participants eligible for analysis, 247 developed ESRD (mean follow-up of 6.3 years). Metabolic health significantly modified the association of BMI with ESRD. In models stratified by the presence or absence of the metabolic syndrome and adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors, higher BMI was associated with lower risk of ESRD in those without (hazard ratio per 5 kg/m(2) increase in BMI 0.70, 95% Cl 0.52, 0.95) but not those with (hazard ratio, 1.06) the metabolic syndrome. In models stratified by weight and metabolic health, compared with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)) participants without the metabolic syndrome the overweight individuals (BMI 25-29.9) and obese individuals (BMI of 30 or more) with the metabolic syndrome had greater risk of ESRD (hazard ratios of 2.03 and 2.29, respectively), whereas obesity without the metabolic syndrome was associated with lower risk of ESRD (hazard ratio 0.47). Thus, higher BMI is associated with lower ESRD risk in those without but not those with the metabolic syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available