4.8 Article

Understanding pretreatment efficacy of four cholinium and imidazolium ionic liquids by chemistry and computation

Journal

GREEN CHEMISTRY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 2546-2557

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3gc42401d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  2. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
  3. [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Certain ionic liquids (ILs) offer a potentially more sustainable and environmentally responsible alternative to organic solvents for many industrial applications, including biorefineries, where they are used to pretreat lignocellulose. To gain a more robust understanding of the roles of cations and anions in the process, we monitored the impact of the respective ILs on Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) in terms of lignin content, cellulose crystallinity, and enzymatic digestibility. The behaviors of four ILs, based on one of two cations, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C(2)mim](+)) and cholinium ([Ch](+)), and one of two anions, acetate ([OAc](-)) and lysinate ([Lys](-)), were compared. While all four ILs were effective in pretreating switchgrass, ILs containing [Lys](-)anions provided greater delignification (70-80% vs. 16-50%) after addition of water as an anti-solvent and higher glucose yields (78-96% vs. 56-90%) compared to those obtained by the use of ILs containing [OAc]-anions. Measurements of the Kamlet-Taft parameters using a series of dyes indicated a greater hydrogen bond basicity for the ILs with [Lys](-)anions as compared to acetate ILs. To understand the effective delignification ability of lysinate-based ILs, interaction energies of individual ions and ion pairs with a model dilignol substrate were determined by quantum chemical calculations. The results show that the addition of antisolvent significantly influenced the interaction energies governing lignin removal during the process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available