4.6 Article

Environmental corporate responsibility for investments evaluation: an alternative multi-objective programming model

Journal

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 247, Issue 2, Pages 395-413

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-015-1820-x

Keywords

Multi-objective programming; Economic crisis; Corporate social responsibility; Energy and environment; Project portfolio selection; Uncertainty; Robustness

Funding

  1. European Union (European Social Fund)
  2. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Education and Lifelong Learning
  3. Hellenic State Scholarship Foundation (IKY)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current financial and economic crisis, as well as growing environmental pressures put seriously under question traditional development patterns. The need to develop alternative models able to address current economic situation through the exploitation of sustainable patterns is of crucial importance. The innovation of this current study is the incorporation of energy and environmental corporate responsibility (EECR) in decision making, supporting particularly the development of a new model for investment evaluation. A bi-objective programming model is introduced in order to provide the Pareto optimal portfolios (Pareto set) based on the net present value of projects and the EECR score of firms. A systematic decision making approach using Monte Carlo simulation and multi-objective programming is also developed in order to deal with the inherent uncertainty in the objective functions' coefficients. The robustness of the Pareto set as a whole, as well as the robustness of the individual Pareto optimal portfolios is also assessed. The proposed approach facilitates banking organizations and institutions to the selection of firms applying for financial support and credit granting, within the frame of their EECR. Finally, an illustrative real-world application of the proposed model is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available