4.3 Article

Production and nutritional value of sorghum and black oat forages under nitrogen fertilization

Journal

GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 693-704

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12076

Keywords

animal feed; Avena strigosa; Sorghum ssp; hybrid; crude protein; in vitro digestibility; Brazil

Categories

Funding

  1. programmes PET-Zootecnia
  2. UTFPR
  3. education assistance programme (PAE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of nitrogen (N) fertilization on the dry-matter (DM) yield and nutritional value of sorghum (Sorghum sp., cv. Jumbo) and black oat (Avena strigosa cv., IPR 61) was investigated in the context of forage and livestock production in southern Brazil. Sorghum was cultivated with 0, 375, 75, 150, 225, 300 and 375kgNha(-1) during the summer crop seasons of 2010/11 and 2011/12. Black oat received 0, 40, 80, 120, 160, 200 and 240kgNha(-1) in the winter of 2011. According to the adjusted polynomial regression, sorghum DM yield increased in response to N up to 288 (129tha(-1)) and 264kgha(-1) (56tha(-1)) in 2010/11 and 2011/12 respectively. Crude protein (CP) content of sorghum was highest at 349 and 328kgNha(-1), but in vitro dry-matter digestibility (IVDMD) was highest at 212-207kgNha(-1) in 2010/11 and 2011/12 respectively. Sorghum neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were not affected by N fertilization. In black oat, the maximum DM yield (60tha(-1)) was obtained with 187kgNha(-1); the IVDMD, NDF and ADF were not affected by N fertilization, but the CP content increased up to 220kgNha(-1). It is concluded that these forage species can improve the year-to-year amount and quality of forage produced but high rates of N fertilizer are required to achieve high yields. Fertilizer N rates of 210-280kgNha(-1) in sorghum and 180kgNha(-1) in black oat in the crop rotation provide the greatest responses in DM yield consistent with good nutritional quality for livestock production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available