4.2 Article

Dynamic simulation of particle packing influenced by size, aspect ratio and surface energy

Journal

GRANULAR MATTER
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 401-415

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-013-0413-0

Keywords

DEM simulation; Packing; Aspect ratio; Surface energy; particle size; Contact geometry

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EEC-0540855, EEC-0951845]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multi-sphere method and JKR model are used in the discrete element method simulation to investigate the effect of the particle size, aspect ratios, and cohesiveness on the packing structure, characterized by porosity, radial distribution function (RDF), coordination number and contact geometry. In the absence of cohesive force, the porosity is nearly invariable with fixed aspect ratio, regardless of the size of the particles. In contrast, as surface energy increases, the porosity increases with decreasing particle size and increasing aspect ratio. The RDF results show that the number of peaks for different aspect ratios changes and show trends similar to the relaxation algorithm, expected for the finer particles. In the case of finer, cohesive particles, the most novel outcome of contact analysis is the existence of single contact, attributed to the formation of a cage structure, which has not been previously reported. The peak position and the width of the contact distributions are affected by higher surface energy because fewer contacts are required to achieve the mechanical equilibrium. Another interesting observation is that higher porosity does not always imply fewer contacts for particles with non-zero aspect ratios and high surface energies. The analysis of the distribution of the contact vector angles is found to better explain increased porosity in spite of higher coordination numbers. The results presented shed light on the packing density and structure, revealing features not easily discerned via experiments, and confirming the important role of the cohesion and aspect ratio in packing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available