4.4 Article

The use of ArgusA® II retinal prosthesis by blind subjects to achieve localisation and prehension of objects in 3-dimensional space

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2912-z

Keywords

Retinitis pigmentosa; Outer retinal degeneration; Retinal prosthesis; Artificial retina; Psychophysical testing

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Health through the National Institute for Health Research
  2. University College London (UCL) Institute of Ophthalmology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ArgusA (R) II retinal prosthesis system has entered mainstream treatment for patients blind from Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP). We set out to evaluate the use of this system by blind subjects to achieve object localisation and prehension in 3-dimensional space. This is a single-centre, prospective, internally-controlled case series involving 5 blind RP subjects who received the ArgusA (R) II implant. The subjects were instructed to visually locate, reach and grasp (i.e. prehension) a small white cuboid object placed at random locations on a black worktop. A flashing LED beacon was attached to the reaching index finger (as a finger marker) to assess the effect of enhanced finger visualisation on performance. Tasks were performed with the prosthesis switched on or off and with the finger marker switched on or off. Forty-eight trials were performed per subject. Trajectory of each subject's hand movement during the task was recorded by a 3D motion-capture unit (QualysisA (R), see supplementary video) and analysed using a MATLAB script. Percentage of successful prehension +/- standard deviation was: 71.3 +/- 27.1 % with prosthesis on and finger marker on; 77.5 +/- 24.5 % with prosthesis on and finger marker off; 0.0 +/- 0.0 % with prosthesis off and finger marker on, and 0.00 +/- 0.00 % with prosthesis off and finger marker off. The finger marker did not have a significant effect on performance (P = 0.546 and 1, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, with prosthesis on and off respectively). With prosthesis off, none of the subjects were able to visually locate the target object and no initiation of prehension was attempted. With prosthesis on, prehension was initiated on 82.5 % (range 59-100 %) of the trials with 89.0 % (range 66.7-100 %) achieving successful prehension. ArgusA (R) II subjects were able to achieve object localisation and prehension better with their prosthesis switched on than off.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available