4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Geochronology and geochemistry of Ordovician felsic volcanism in the Southern Armorican Massif (Variscan belt, France): Implications for the breakup of Gondwana

Journal

GONDWANA RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1019-1036

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.030

Keywords

Porphyritic felsic volcanics; Variscan belt; Porphyroid Nappe; Ollo de Sapo; Ordovician; Zircon geochronology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-grade, porphyritic felsic metavolcanics make up a significant volume of the South Armorican domain (Variscan belt, France). Their age and geochemistry are the first focus of this paper. These rocks have long been considered to be Silurian in age because they are either thrust over Silurian sediments (the so-called Porphyroid Nappe) or inserted within the Silurian sediments, acting as a decollement level (Para-autochthon), and because of a previous zircon age. Five new U-Pb SHRIMP zircon dates for the felsic volcanics from the Porphyroid Nappe and its Para-autochthon define Ordovician ages between 473 +/- 5 and 494 +/- 4 Ma. These Ordovician metavolcanics are mainly of calc-alkaline affinity, probably in response to the reworking of the Ediacaran sediments derived from the Cadomian belt (Brioverian), variably mixed with a Paleoproterozoic (Icartian) component in metatuffs. A second focus of this paper is the integration of this volcanism at the scale of the Variscan belt. Because of its Early Ordovician age and calk-alkaline chemistry, the felsic volcanism from the Porphyroid Nappe is similar to the well-known Ollo de Sapo Formation in the Iberian Massif. Hence, the volcanism allows a better understanding of (i) the Early Ordovician rifting along the northern Gondwana margin, and (ii) the large-scale structure of the Variscan belt from the Iberian Massif to the French Massif Central (i.e. along the Ibero-Arrnorican Arc). (C) 2011 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available