4.4 Review

Impact of mannose-binding lectin insufficiency on the course of cystic fibrosis: A review and meta-analysis

Journal

GLYCOBIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 271-282

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwq161

Keywords

cystic fibrosis; mannose-binding lectin; mannan-binding lectin; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Medical Research Council [G0800428] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0800428] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is an innate immune protein produced by the liver. MBL binds to glycoconjugates containing mannose, fucose or N-acetylglucosamine that are present in a wide variety of bacteria, viruses and fungi. Upon binding, MBL may active the lectin pathway of complement or directly opsonize organisms to enhance phagocytosis. MBL is primarily a serum protein but accumulates in the lung during acute inflammation. Recent evidence suggests an important role for MBL in a variety of infectious disorders. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multisystem disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR). The course of CF lung disease is highly variable even in patients with the same CFTR genotype, suggesting that other modulator genes are important for prognosis. MBL has been proposed as a possible modulator of clinical severity in CF. In this review and meta-analysis, we found that MBL2 genotypes associated with MBL insufficiency were associated with earlier acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P < 0.0001), reduced pulmonary function among adult patients (P < 0.0001 for forced expiratory volume), and an increased rate of death or requirement for lung transplantation (odds ratio 3.69; P = 0.02). The available evidence therefore suggests that MBL insufficiency is associated with the severity of CF lung disease. The possible future prophylactic or therapeutic application of MBL replacement is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available