4.4 Article

Levels of specific glycans significantly distinguish lymph node-positive from lymph node-negative breast cancer patients

Journal

GLYCOBIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1283-1288

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwq090

Keywords

biomarker; breast cancer; lymph nodes; N-linked glycans; sLe(x)

Funding

  1. Irish Cancer Society
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [08/SRC/B1410]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [08/SRC/B1410] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most urgent requirements in breast cancer is the development of a blood-based test for early detection and prognosis. Previously published results found a significant difference between specific glycan levels in patients with advanced breast cancer and healthy controls. The aim of this investigation was to address a more clinically relevant problem, i.e., whether the measurement of specific glycans could identify women with aggressive disease at an early stage. In order to reduce potential bias in this study, blood samples from patients were collected, stored and analyzed in a similar manner. Agalactosyl biantennary glycans (FA2) and glycans containing the sialyl Lewis x epitope (A3F1G1 and A2F1G1) were measured using high throughput normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography in combination with exoglycosidase digestions in sera from 52 patients with early breast cancer (21 with lymph node-negative and 20 with lymph node-positive disease) and 134 women with benign breast disease. The combined levels of the glycans were significantly higher in patients with lymph node metastases compared to women without these metastases. Lymph node status is the single most important determinant of survival in early stage breast cancer. As high levels of these glycans were associated with nodal metastases, their measurement may provide a new non-invasive approach to determining prognosis in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available