4.8 Article

Size increase in high elevation ground squirrels over the last century

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 1499-1508

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02644.x

Keywords

body size; California; Callospermophilus lateralis; climate change; ground squirrels; Otospermophilus beecheyi; Sierra Nevada; Urocitellus beldingi

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB 0640859]
  2. National Parks Service
  3. Yosemite Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is increasing evidence for morphological change in response to recent environmental change, but how this relates to fluctuations in geographic range remains unclear. We measured museum specimens from two time periods (19021950 and 20002008) that vary significantly in climate to assess if and how two high elevation contracting species of ground squirrels in the Sierra Nevada of California, Belding's ground squirrel (Urocitellus beldingi) and the golden-mantled ground squirrel (Callospermophilus lateralis), and one lower elevation, stable species, the California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi), have responded morphologically to changes over the last century. We measured skull length (condylobasal length), an ontogenetically more labile trait highly correlated with body size, and maxillary toothrow length, a more developmentally constrained trait predictive of skull shape. C. lateralis and U. beldingi, both obligate hibernators, have increased in body size, but have not changed in shape. In contrast, O. beecheyi, which only hibernates in parts of its range, has shown no significant change in either morphometric trait. The increase in body size in the higher elevation species, hypothesized to be a plastic effect due to a longer growing season and thus prolonged food availability, opposes the expected direction of selection for decreased body size under chronic warming. Our study supports that population contraction is related to physiological rather than nutritional constraints.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available